Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
11–20 of 99 posts
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#12It’s so tempting to make some snide remark about it being cancelled.
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#13I'm curious what's driving the resurgence in interest authorization infrastructure, particularly the Zanzibar paper. As founder of Oso ( https://www.osohq.com/ ), I have my own opinions, and I think this is a good thing. But would love to hear others' points of view here.
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#14I'm curious what's driving the resurgence in interest authorization infrastructure, particularly the Zanzibar paper. As founder of Oso ( https://www.osohq.com/ ), I have my own opinions, and I think this is a good thing. But would love to hear others' points of view here.
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#15If so, does that become a chokepoint in a distributed microservice architecture? Or can that be avoided with an in-process or sidecar architecture in which a given microservice's objects are not separately referenced in auth persistence? If not, how do folks determine which objects to register with the auth service and which to handle independently?
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#16Google stands on it.
Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#17Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#18Re: Zanzibar: Google’s Consistent, Global Authorization System (2019)
#19Reminds me how how Basecamp would have acted during WW2 as well. Nothing to do with business so take it outside.