Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
11–20 of 47 posts
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#12Thanks but I’d rather decide what’s misinformation for myself.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#13I’m not spending time reading a salon article, but I’m willing to bet money that their definition of “repeat misinformer” is total bullshit.
Edit: you've unfortunately been breaking the site guidelines so often that I think we need to ban this account. If you don't want to be banned on HN, you're welcome to email hn@ycombinator.com and give us reason to believe that you've read the guidelines and genuinely want to use the site as intended.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#14Thanks but I’d rather decide what’s misinformation for myself.
Where to draw the line is the point of the discussion, because the democracy of the viral nonsense is causing more damage than a straight up dictatorship, IMO.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#15lol - "repeat misinformers" Ministry of Truth indeed. Orwell wrote 1984 as a warning, not as a flipping implementation guide.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#16And who determines what is “misinformation”?
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#17Thanks but I’d rather decide what’s misinformation for myself.
Me too, but most people can't be trusted to decide for themselves and are lead to believe crazy shit only because it brings ad revenue in the best case, because of interests of bad actors in the worst. Where to draw the line is the point of the discussion, because the democracy of the viral nonsense is causing more damage than a straight up dictatorship, IMO.
Let people make their own decisions.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#18Thanks but I’d rather decide what’s misinformation for myself.
Me too, but most people can't be trusted to decide for themselves and are lead to believe crazy shit only because it brings ad revenue in the best case, because of interests of bad actors in the worst. Where to draw the line is the point of the discussion, because the democracy of the viral nonsense is causing more damage than a straight up dictatorship, IMO.
Re: Facebook could stop 10B impressions from “repeat misinformers”, but doesn't
#19And who determines what is “misinformation”?
Who will guard the guards?
But as neither nationalization of a large tech company such as Facebook nor giving it a monopoly over information seems desirable, why don’t we just agree that it should stay out of this completely.