Live data from Hacker News

Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

npr.org

11–20 of 78 posts

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#11
Really misleading headline. The study wasn't about hammocks at all, just a normal bed that sways. Makes me think more of being on a boat. I haven't experienced the effect, but David Foster Wallace wrote about it: http://www.harpers.org/media/pdf/dfw/HarpersMagazine-1996-01...

(Not going to give the page number of the sleep thing because I believe everyone should read the whole thing :)

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#12
The article says it "increased the length of N2 sleep, a form of non-REM sleep that takes up about half of a good night's rest." Presumably this is at the cost of REM sleep? How is this then a good thing?

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#13
post #3

How much better? Give me a number so I can judge if I think its relevant...

It seems that the main focus of the article is on the difference in brain activity, not the sleep time. I would imagine that the time to sleep is not as important as the quality of the sleep thus attained.

I agree, and as such this article leaves my main question unanswered: with a bed that rocks (or a hammock), could I get the same amount of rest in less time?

In other words, what is the ratio of sleeping hours in a non-moving bed to a rocking-bed?

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#14
A lot of long distance through-hikers on the Appalachian Trail here in the Eastern US use hammocks instead of tents. They're gotten a lot more popular due to the "lightweight" craze in backpacking (trying to shave every ounce off your full pack weight) and set up/break down a lot faster.

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#16
post #3

How much better? Give me a number so I can judge if I think its relevant...

It seems that the main focus of the article is on the difference in brain activity, not the sleep time. I would imagine that the time to sleep is not as important as the quality of the sleep thus attained.

The journal article indicates that the rocked subjects went from a waking state to deeper states of sleep quicker than than those non-rocked... So that should yield a time savings.

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#17
I don't like how they basically squeeze around your body, wrapping you all up. It's hard to turn around or even just to the side.

I guess the article was more about the 4 second rocking motion, though, which sounds delightful just from description.

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#19
post #9
post #5

So, is it possible to set up an indoor hammock in a small room?

Sure. I live in a very old house that is made of brick, so I couldn't really mount mine directly to the walls (I could , but I'd rather not anchor things into the brick on a house I don't own [it's a rental]). I bought a hammock stand for $100 and it fits in my rather small bedroom just fine.

Wait, there are hammock stands? Thank you. Purchasing one right away.

Re: Hammocks Make Sleep Easier, Deeper

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It seems that the main focus of the article is on the difference in brain activity, not the sleep time. I would imagine that the time to sleep is not as important as the quality of the sleep thus attained.

I agree, and as such this article leaves my main question unanswered: with a bed that rocks (or a hammock), could I get the same amount of rest in less time? In other words, what is the ratio of sleeping hours in a non-moving bed to a rocking-bed?

> could I get the same amount of rest in less time?

I'm dubious of anything that claims to pull this off. My own failed attempts have convinced me that sleep is not something that can be lifehacked. There is some variation in sleep requirements between individuals, but you and I each have a number (probably ~8 hours) below which our bodies start getting cranky. There are loads of studies showing that any form of sleep deprivation -- and I would include here trying to optimize down your overall sleep time -- has reliable, long term negative consequences. What's more, there seems to be an unusual level of consensus on this subject. (I say 'unusual' because medical researchers never agree on anything. :-)

Post reply on HN