Live data from Hacker News

CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

readwriteweb.com

11–20 of 134 posts

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#11
Works for me.

It puts me on edge that these idiots would pick such media-friendly targets to strafe with their clueless bandwidth wastage; not looking forward to the next round of "cyber security" laws one bit.

"Hey dad, tell me just one more time about how when you were a kid you used to be able to make TCP connections freely and without the connection first being authorized by the NSA." "Go to sleep, son."

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#13
Off topic, sorry, but not sure where I'd ask this.

I posted this news 15 minutes before this submission. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2659263

Can someone explain to this newbie why mine disappeared so quickly, but this stayed? I don't have a problem at all, I just wish to understand the system thanks.

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#14

Off topic, sorry, but not sure where I'd ask this. I posted this news 15 minutes before this submission. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2659263 Can someone explain to this newbie why mine disappeared so quickly, but this stayed? I don't have a problem at all, I just wish to understand the system thanks.

well one reason would be OP linked to an article, you linked to a site that doesnt load...

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#15
post #3

Hilariously, the massive media frenzy surrounding the site outage will send the site enough traffic to DDOS it, even if LulzSec never meaningfully impacted it in the first place.

My first thought too. I immediately tried to load CIA and then thought, "Maybe they didn't hack it at all but just put out their Twitter message to drive traffic at it?" Or more interestingly, if they were in the process of hacking or something and wanted the cover of a torrent of strangers trying to reach their site.

I just happened to be looking at my Twitter feed the very moment they posted, and clicked the link immediately. No go.

Would this effect happen so quick? I guess they do have a lot of followers, but I'd hope that even if all of them did what I did they could survive that amount of hits?

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#17
post #5
post #4

Confirming that it is indeed down for me. I wonder what the CIA are going to do, especially because LulzSec is directly targeting them now.

I doubt that the core of the CIA cares too much about it's public-facing website.

It's got a few important uses. Recruiting, public relations, etc. And then, there's the loss of face in having it down.

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#18

Off topic, sorry, but not sure where I'd ask this. I posted this news 15 minutes before this submission. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2659263 Can someone explain to this newbie why mine disappeared so quickly, but this stayed? I don't have a problem at all, I just wish to understand the system thanks.

well one reason would be OP linked to an article, you linked to a site that doesnt load...

Ah :-) So I should have used the text option then?

A broken link gets it immediately marked down? Makes sense.

Re: CIA.gov Possibly Down, LulzSec Claims Responsibility

#20
post #10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

True, it's probably little more then a coat of paint on it's house. That being said, they're probably paying more attention to those that just threw eggs all over it, and if they chose, to act accordingly. Not like there woudl be much that would stop them.

I agree with the coat of paint comment but if we have learned anything about government agencies or large corporations being hacked in the past it is that their Internet security practices can sometimes be painfully bad. @Below and HBGary was a IT security firm after all...

The CIA should be relatively secure: they are an intelligence agency, after all. Breaching a intelligence agency's website will cause the agency to lose more face than a Senator does after his or her website is hacked.
Post reply on HN