Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

ddosecrets.substack.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–18 of 18 posts

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#11

Post by MAXDOWNVOTE »

throwawaysea wrote: post #10

It’s incredible to me that people can applaud for the illegal activities of hacktivists like donk enby or the ddos secrets people ( https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/DDoSecrets:About ) but aggressively accuse their political opponents of “doxxing” for recording crimes by rioters or antifa in public spaces. If it isn’t apparently already, hacktivists are by and large just a criminal arm of the progressive political machine.…

Given Twitter's intense proclivity for banning political dissent, there is a 100% likelihood they got the nod from the FBI to leave this up as a honeypot for idiots to flock to like flies to shit. Didn't Twitter just update their hacked materials policy? Why the exception here? How are these people dodging indictments using no opsec?

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#12

Post by __blockcipher__ »

MAXDOWNVOTE wrote: post #11
throwawaysea wrote: post #10

It’s incredible to me that people can applaud for the illegal activities of hacktivists like donk enby or the ddos secrets people ( https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/DDoSecrets:About ) but aggressively accuse their political opponents of “doxxing” for recording crimes by rioters or antifa in public spaces. If it isn’t apparently already, hacktivists are by and large just a criminal arm of the progressive political machine.…

Given Twitter's intense proclivity for banning political dissent, there is a 100% likelihood they got the nod from the FBI to leave this up as a honeypot for idiots to flock to like flies to shit. Didn't Twitter just update their hacked materials policy? Why the exception here? How are these people dodging indictments using no opsec?

In fairness, the hacked materials policy was a very transparent attempt to suppress the whole Hunter Biden laptop saga. (I really don’t give a fuck about that whole story but you can’t talk about the hacked materials policy without mentioning its genesis). So I don’t think a double standard is hard to explain.

(I do think your guess is a plausible one)

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#13

Post by 6AA4FD »

busterarm wrote: post #4

As someone who has grown up around and knows many of the world's most notable hackers, it never fails to surprise me about the ignorance of the law demonstrated by "hacktivists" and other so-called "white hats". The hero worship of MalwareTech, despite the fact that he absolutely committed crimes _which he plead guilty to_ is often the biggest clue. As much as you can think you're on Team GoodGuy, if you commit crime…

Maybe I'm missing something about the MalwareTech story, but I don't think it's surprising people celebrate him. When I read some large feature on him (I'm sorry, I don't remember where) my impression was that he had royally screwed up as a young person, but that he was trying to turn his life around and did a serious good deed for the internet as a whole with his contribution to the wannacry thing. Many people make mistakes at any phase of life, and it's not surprising to me that people might celebrate people who try to move past that and do good.

edit: I believe [0] was the feature I read.

[0]: https://www.wired.com/story/confessions-marcus-hutchins-hack...

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#14

Post by busterarm »

6AA4FD wrote: post #13
busterarm wrote: post #4

As someone who has grown up around and knows many of the world's most notable hackers, it never fails to surprise me about the ignorance of the law demonstrated by "hacktivists" and other so-called "white hats". The hero worship of MalwareTech, despite the fact that he absolutely committed crimes _which he plead guilty to_ is often the biggest clue. As much as you can think you're on Team GoodGuy, if you commit crime…

Maybe I'm missing something about the MalwareTech story, but I don't think it's surprising people celebrate him. When I read some large feature on him (I'm sorry, I don't remember where) my impression was that he had royally screwed up as a young person, but that he was trying to turn his life around and did a serious good deed for the internet as a whole with his contribution to the wannacry thing. Many people make…

He lied to investigators when he was arrested and continued to do so until they laid out all the evidence that they had against him. The timeline of his turnaround is also absurdly short (he continued to sell his malware until a couple of months before he "turned hero") and the malware he took down was literally his competition.

What you posted is a good story to tell though. Turning your life around after doing dumb shit in your real name and getting caught is plenty convenient but not worthy of hero worship.

The only reason MalwareTech served no time is because Ollam and his wife used their influence, political connections and their bank accounts to lobby aggressively on his behalf.

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#15

Post by hjiofdgojhi5489 »

__blockcipher__ wrote: post #12
MAXDOWNVOTE wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Given Twitter's intense proclivity for banning political dissent, there is a 100% likelihood they got the nod from the FBI to leave this up as a honeypot for idiots to flock to like flies to shit. Didn't Twitter just update their hacked materials policy? Why the exception here? How are these people dodging indictments using no opsec?

In fairness, the hacked materials policy was a very transparent attempt to suppress the whole Hunter Biden laptop saga. (I really don’t give a fuck about that whole story but you can’t talk about the hacked materials policy without mentioning its genesis). So I don’t think a double standard is hard to explain. (I do think your guess is a plausible one)

What did the Hunter Biden laptop have to do with hacks? I thought it was left at a repair shop.

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#16

Post by ryanlol »

6AA4FD wrote: post #13
busterarm wrote: post #4

As someone who has grown up around and knows many of the world's most notable hackers, it never fails to surprise me about the ignorance of the law demonstrated by "hacktivists" and other so-called "white hats". The hero worship of MalwareTech, despite the fact that he absolutely committed crimes _which he plead guilty to_ is often the biggest clue. As much as you can think you're on Team GoodGuy, if you commit crime…

Maybe I'm missing something about the MalwareTech story, but I don't think it's surprising people celebrate him. When I read some large feature on him (I'm sorry, I don't remember where) my impression was that he had royally screwed up as a young person, but that he was trying to turn his life around and did a serious good deed for the internet as a whole with his contribution to the wannacry thing. Many people make…

> but that he was trying to turn his life around

He realized that he sucked at making money by developing malware and decided to pivot to working for other people.

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#17

Post by PartiallyTyped »

throwawaysea wrote: post #10

It’s incredible to me that people can applaud for the illegal activities of hacktivists like donk enby or the ddos secrets people ( https://ddosecrets.com/wiki/DDoSecrets:About ) but aggressively accuse their political opponents of “doxxing” for recording crimes by rioters or antifa in public spaces. If it isn’t apparently already, hacktivists are by and large just a criminal arm of the progressive political machine.…

Could it be that hacktivists align themselves with the progressive and anti-authoritarian left as they value individual freedom and mutual aid?

That is much more plausible than assuming they are a leftist criminal arm. Actually, had that been the case, we would have seen hacktivists that support both sides, because, as you said, they are 'just a criminal arm' and can be bought.

Re: Hacktivism, leaktivism and the future

#18

Post by ganoushoreilly »

busterarm wrote: post #9
ganoushoreilly wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

100%. The amount of people chasing SCENE cred is crazy.

It's so much worse on the professional side of things. The number of glamorous security jobs is extremely tiny compared to all of the "SOC2 Compliance" checklist jobs out there. They've created the same kind of status economy that plagues academia to the point where you're on the "publish or die"/"be somebody on twitter or die" treadmill. As a result, I've seen so much recycled research trying to be passed around as…

Yep, as someone that first attended Defcon 6 (at the Plaza), things have gone from keeping it quiet and underground to blast it on twitter for cred. Crazy thing is there are a lot of these Twit-iots that barely work in the industry and as you said, repeat others work.

I know a large number of them personally, some of them are nice people, but most of them are pretty insecure and constantly looking for acknowledgement. To a degree I guess we all are.

The number of people that want to skip working in IT / understanding other parts of business and go directly to their Offensive Security Cert and be called a hacker is numbing. Theres a reason most of the training programs within the leading firms / govt agencies, require following the apprentice / journeyman process much like other trades. It takes time and a deep understanding.

But nah.. i'll skip all that because check out mah tweeets.

Post reply on HN