Live data from Hacker News

Let there be more biographies of failures

commonreader.substack.com

11–20 of 155 posts

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#11

I really enjoyed this story because it introduced me to an interesting person I had never heard about. I did not enjoy the last paragraph where it tried to shoehorn a bunch of bizarre lessons learned from this story, some of which didn't make sense and at least one seemed contradictory.

Yes, the small treasure here is the story of Paul Otlet's ideas and work. The 'lessons learned', not so much.

It's a sound concept to learn lessons from the failures of others, even, and perhaps especially those others who otherwise excel in their field. However, as this piece shows, it's easy to draw the wrong lessons from singular biographies.

A better approach might be how failures are investigated, analyzed, and cataloged in various fields such as aviation and rock climbing. Those seemingly dry failure reports can make surprisingly fascinating reading, and the collections that bring them closer to data than anecdotes can provide powerful insights.

So, maybe some kind of Institute For The Study of Career Disasters? Not entirely joking, it'd be genuinely helpful to, for example, go beyond just the "90% of all small businesses fail in X years", and provide actual analyzed insight (not just more anecdotes) into what makes the difference between success and failure, and what failures have good prospects of successful restarting (i.e., their death was more likely just bad luck /Force Majeure vs pilot error)...

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#12
Amen! I've found that 9 times out of 10 successful people follow the same advice and believe the same things as unsuccessful people (at least they SAY they do). So it's really useful to look at people who failed yet followed the same advice.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivorship_bias

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#13
post #8
post #4

Yes. Also in sports journalism, I'm not really interested in the stories of people who finished first, second or third. I want to read about those who always finish 10th place or lower. Their struggle must be much more interesting.

as a basketball fan, i'm fascinated by the players barely hanging on to a roster spot on any given team. the storylines vary widely, from veteran there to teach the youngsters, to scrappy upstart who barely made the cut, to the sibling of a star player. in the nba, these are guys who are literally better than 99.9999% of the planet, and yet, they often seem to be treated like hangers-on rather than some of the best.

I like to think that's part of the appeal of Crash Davis and just the lifestyle of a minor league baseball team in Bull Durham.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bull_Durham

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#14
When I saw the title, I initially rolled my eyes[0], but I have to concede a lot of the points the author is making with regard to the examples he's chosen. There is value in biographies covering failures.

My first thought was "there's no market for it". But yes, there definitely is -- at least, I'm part of it. I remember watching a documentary on covering an early .com failure that with a few tweaks would have been a biography about the failures of the CEO and the tragedy of that experience in his life. It was a very unique failure and it interested me because it was a failure at a level I had not experienced in my life[1].

There is a very similar market in the "failure biography" category: True Crime. I feel it's the closest analog. Outside of the books that are written simply because the crime is so gruesome, many are about particularly clever criminal(s) and the errors that led to their capture[2]. While these books often focus on the whole process, and might center around an investigator's hunt for a criminal, there are plenty where "A Biography of Stabby McMurderFace" would be a better title. I'm sure there's an abstraction and a way to map the successes/failures from a true crime book to adequately apply to non-criminal life. Everything I know about software development says it must be true. /s

[0] There seems to be a growing trend with hating on people who are successful, whether it's entirely dismissing their success as "luck" or pointing out the obvious fact that "reading a Biography will not teach you how to become a multi-millionaire". Or worse, that reading about a successful person's life is a harmful way to use your limited entertainment time (when did it become popular to write articles talking to adults like they've not been on this planet their whole, adult, life? Do we need to be told that wild success is an outlier just because a few adults need instructions to operate Shampoo?).

[1] I won't deny it, I was watching it 80% for the "train-wreck" of it all and only 20% for the cautionary tale aspects, but you consume both.

[2] There is the third, "unsolved", category and I don't know what percentage all of these books represent of the whole, but I'd consider only the "failed criminals" which at-a-glance appears to be the most common.

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#15
Failure is depressing, people who advocate this advise have succeeded after failure.

I posit that if you wrote your biography of failure while failing, it only wastes precious time to correct course.

“Winners” should write fewer lines and attribute it to: genes and luck.

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#16
Same for education. Let students see how many failures and wrong theories occured in the past, even from the smartest brains of their days. And stop forcing godspell like knowledge onto brains. Make them try, think, sweat, imagine, converge or diverge and correct themselves with some guidance to avoid too much confusion.

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#17

You shouldn’t be afraid of failure, but it’s a bad fetish. If failure can help future endeavors great, but there’s nothing inherently interesting about failing a lot.

A good life is often a fine balance between pleasure risk taking, size of risk, and increase of good outcome/experiences.

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#19
How about biographies of mediocre people? I'm not really successful or a failure. Granted my professional and personal life is very boring. I don't see people wanting to read it, but it would be more accurate of the average experience than either end of the bell curve.

Re: Let there be more biographies of failures

#20

You shouldn’t be afraid of failure, but it’s a bad fetish. If failure can help future endeavors great, but there’s nothing inherently interesting about failing a lot.

If you work on things with a 5% chance of success but 1000x potential return, it absolutely makes sense to keep trying if you have the capacity to take on that much risk.
Post reply on HN