Live data from Hacker News

Ransonware as a Weapon – Interview with REvil’s Unknown

therecord.media

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: Ransonware as a Weapon – Interview with REvil’s Unknown

#11
post #2

I thought this was a really interesting look at the commercial end of ransomware. Clearly shows that as an attack class it's not going anywhere for the time being and it'll just be a growing issue. With the amounts of money being made, you can also expect increasing sophistication as it'll make financial sense to invest. The comments about targeting companies with insurance were also interesting. I guess it's a smart…

> The comments about targeting companies with insurance were also interesting. I guess it's a smart way to make sure you get a guaranteed payout. But also I can see insurance rates going up and/or companies getting out of the market if they have to pay out too often.

Insurance companies are often a mix of care and greed. I think a boutique insurance brokerage for ransomware might do very well if they drive changes in the client's operations through their exclusion clauses and fee structures. Find a bank or finance house willing to underwrite such an operation, perhaps with the possibility of a fat consultancy income stream to go along with it, and there is money to be made.

Re: Ransonware as a Weapon – Interview with REvil’s Unknown

#12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

>The translator intentionally wrote the responses to take advantage of metered speech so the reader doesn't make full thoughts as they read. I'm not sure what you mean by this.

Metered speech is a speaking and writing pattern whereby you pause after so many syllables in order to prevent your audience from grasping the full idea of what is being said. Let me demonstrate this for you. Metered speech, is a speaking, and writing, pattern whereby you pause after so many syllables, in order to prevent your audience from, grasping the full idea, of what is being said. Let me, demonstrate this for…

I appreciate the explanation.

I'm not convinced that metering your speech in this was has a specific, universal effect on an audience. (ie, I dispute the claim that metered speech prevents the audience from comprehending.)

To be clear, I'm equally skeptical that the mainstream media is attempting to deceive people by intentionally adopting this method. But even if they were, I simply don't believe it could be effective.

(although I'll admit it's bad writing.)

Post reply on HN