An uppercase theta should be used for "Big Θ time complexity" regarding algorithms but for angles like in the article, it should be the lowercase theta that looks like this: θ.
Short fat engineers are undervalued
11–20 of 269 posts
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#12The reality often goes against the premise of the article. What are accomplishments of tall.skinny vs short.fat engineers? Linux was driven by Linus T, javascript by Brendan E, Apple by 2 Steve’s, etc. Innovation and creativity are more highly valued, which are byproducts of short.skinny type.
> On a long enough time line, wisdom is always more valuable than knowledge.
In practice, context is everything. That’s why for every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert.
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#13Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#14The reality often goes against the premise of the article. What are accomplishments of tall.skinny vs short.fat engineers? Linux was driven by Linus T, javascript by Brendan E, Apple by 2 Steve’s, etc. Innovation and creativity are more highly valued, which are byproducts of short.skinny type.
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#15Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#16The valve employee handbook talks about the T shaped engineer (page 32) https://media.steampowered.com/apps/valve/Valve_Handbook_Low...
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#17Really, this is why programming languages are my "home base" of expertise. It's the study of formal ideas and their communication.
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#18Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#19A lot of companies are focusing on hiring "short fat" engineers. Especially companies having "dev ops" engineering model, where engineers must be able to work on all stages of the product lifecycle - from design, development, testing, to deployment and operations.
Re: Short fat engineers are undervalued
#20As value is largely determined by scarcity (supply and demand), this would cause "short fat" to be of lower value.