The problem with WhatsApp is not that users are locked in. You can install as many chat apps as you want. WhatsApp has no exclusivity over its users. The problem with WhatsApp is that it only has one alternative. In terms of chat apps that use the signal protocol there's two: WhatsApp and Signal. And Signal is not quite as good as WhatsApp. It's certainly much improved but it's not there yet.
There are a few alternatives, actually. There is also Element (based on Matrix), and XMPP which use encryption based on the Signal Protocol. Both are mentioned in the article. And yes: users are locked in, because your whole social network is expected to be on WhatsApp. 1) you need to convince others to find you on alternatives (every single person even people you just met, you have to explain what&why; also: workpla…
WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
11–20 of 112 posts
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#12WhatsApp squandered their early lead with slow development and so competitors like Line, Viber, Wechat and Telegram all came later and added features and took market share. If you are an international business person, you have all these messengers installed, and more. The switching cost is low, and the only real trouble is agreeing with someone on how to connect.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#13Email benefits from network effects. The difference is that email is designed to be decentralized and from the beginning had many clients with open protocols. IRC similar. And of course, the web browser itself. DNS.
Back when these were invented, people had many different operating systems and architectures, so the protocol was more important than the client/server. Today, we have about three platforms: web, iOS and Android, meaning you can reach millions of users with software rapidly, rather than the slow way of pushing a protocol. There’s less incentive to have decentralization and there’s money to be made. Protocols require cooperation and therefore move slower. SMS and IRC and email don’t feel modern because they move at glacial pace of cooperation.
I think therefore it’s harder today to push a decentralized, more free protocol than it was when we had more OS/arch diversity. When in a quasi-mono-culture, protocols take a back seat. People don’t ask about it or know what they are. The ratios are flipped: we have basically three OSes and a very large diversity of app/services all incompatible and each locking you in.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#14If a company provides a free and open source software product and they are composed of a small number of employees, it can be easier for the community to trust, observe and hold that entity accountable for their changes and roadmap.
There's a balance to strike, of course; extremely small teams may be more limited in what they can achieve.
But I think that can be overcome by identifying the bottlenecks and spinning off smaller free and open source software enterprises to fill the gaps, fostering a positive feedback loop. To a certain extent this mirrors the Unix philosophy regarding command-line tools.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#15Other countries? Other from what? The non-other country isn't defined in the paragraph leading to this sentence.
Like many people I detest Facebook and don't defend it. But this is sloppy writing and sloppy thinking.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#16> Free calls helped it grow to become the de-facto communication platform in many other countries. Other countries? Other from what? The non-other country isn't defined in the paragraph leading to this sentence. Like many people I detest Facebook and don't defend it. But this is sloppy writing and sloppy thinking.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#17"domestication" makes me think of "oversocialization" used in the unabomber manifesto[1]. > 24. Psychologists use the term “socialization” to designate the process by which children are trained to think and act as society demands. A person is said to be well socialized if he believes in and obeys the moral code of his society and fits in well as a functioning part of that society. > ... > 26. Oversocialization can le…
If you're going to have anything resembling a community, you're going to need strongly enforced norms (aka "oversocialization") that minimize internal strife and division. This is true for hunter-gatherer bands and continent-spanning civilizations.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#18WhatsApp grew to its size because of its first mover advantage. The completion, SMS, had the highest cost of data transmission on the planet, so not hard to see the reason for its growth. WhatsApp squandered their early lead with slow development and so competitors like Line, Viber, Wechat and Telegram all came later and added features and took market share. If you are an international business person, you have all t…
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#19Interesting article, I find domestication analogy quite apt.
Re: WhatsApp and the Domestication of Users
#20“WhatsApp’s existing users were held captive by the fact that leaving WhatsApp meant losing the ability to communicate with WhatsApp users.” I'm confused. I thought everyone was identified by their phone number, which can be used to receive texts from anyone.
Had SMS supported group text, Whatsapp would have never existed in the 1st world (and had SMS been free in Asia, Whatsapp would have never existed at all).
Being able to communicate via [free wifi/a much smaller data cost] was a big selling point.