11–20 of 53 posts
Here is a description on what service pastebin provides: "Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time."
It doesn't make pastebin abused just because some internet individual thinks it is only for interesting source code.
Why is it considered an abuse? Here is a description on what service pastebin provides: "Pastebin.com is the number one paste tool since 2002. Pastebin is a website where you can store text online for a set period of time." It doesn't make pastebin abused just because some internet individual thinks it is only for interesting source code.
"just because some internet individual"
Your condescending tone implies undisclosed motives. I might be wrong, feel free to correct me.
Never thought about this. It's scary what even a basic search such as site:pastebin.com password username can return.
and http://rafb.net/paste/ before it was shut down
It's kind of rude not to edit out the usernames and passwords from his examples.
He states "I have changed some details to protect the innocent." While I haven't tested any of the examples myself, I'd assume they're subtly munged.
I thought everyone knew this. Pastebin hasn't been used seriously for pasting code snippets for years, everyone's moved to one of the ( much ) better pastebins. Here's just a few i can think of off the top of my head: http://paste.pocoo.org/ http://gist.github.com/ http://dpaste.org/ http://fpaste.org/ http://codepad.org/ and http://rafb.net/paste/ before it was shut down