Live data from Hacker News

$45,000 algorithmic contest

tunedit.org

11–12 of 12 posts

Re: $45,000 algorithmic contest

#11

they want 95% classification done using 16KHz sampling of "passive electromagnetic emission" (i.e. basically noise). Good luck classifying between me and Pavarotti only by listening to our breath over the phone.

For reference, the wavelength of an 8 KiHz electromagnetic wave (the Nyquist frequency at their sampling rate) is over 36 km. (Edit: at the speed of light in vacuum, that is.)

Perhaps I'm misunderstanding something, but this would seem to limit the spatial resolution that could be achieved by sampling a single stream of passive voltages at that rate, and I would expect differences between materials to mostly be on the microscale. But they don't say what other constraints might be in effect or what the materials or environment are, either, so…

Re: $45,000 algorithmic contest

#12

they want 95% classification done using 16KHz sampling of "passive electromagnetic emission" (i.e. basically noise). Good luck classifying between me and Pavarotti only by listening to our breath over the phone.

If they're currently getting 79% accuracy, there must be some significant signal there. No idea if 95% is achievable, but unless they're already using the absolute optimal approach, something at least into the 80s should be possible.
Post reply on HN