Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
Also, nothing teleported. The photon in question was sent via a laser.
11–20 of 31 posts
Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
Also, nothing teleported. The photon in question was sent via a laser.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
it feels like the core advantage over current information transportation is for inter planetary communication.
I still do not understand, as they do not carry Qubits, but they use laser to transmit information, why not use the laser in the first place to transmit information?
Would that work with an object of the size and mass of, say, a mother in law? Just curious...
(2017)
Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
it feels like the core advantage over current information transportation is for inter planetary communication.
Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
Can someone please explain how is quantum teleportation different than, transmitting information about object and then making another object behave the same way as the first one?
Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
The article is essentially nonsense. Entanglement cannot transmit arbitrary information. At best, it can provide remote synchronization. E.g. my photon collapsed to a 0, therefore I know my partner's photon is a 1. We will execute Playbook A. Also, nothing teleported. The photon in question was sent via a laser.
Can someone ELI5 why this doesn't break the "information can't move faster than the speed of light" rule?
As current widely admitted interpretation of red shift tell us, there are star moving away from us at a pace faster than speed of light, due to time-space inflation.
And finally, one possible interpretation of quantic intrication is that the change reflected on two distant objects is that there are actually the same object on some dimension which we can't grab with our tools.
None of these invalidate the idea of a maximum speed for all objects along a given dimension of a stable space.