Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
11–20 of 364 posts
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#12Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#13While the point of Apple Silicon is undoubtedly for Apple to have more control over their ecosystem, this article doesn't make that point very well. For example: > However, there’s a clear nudge for developers to publish their recompiled apps to Apple’s store. That doesn't make any sense. Where is the "nudge" coming from? The article doesn't make any argument for how that works, given that you can share universal bin…
I had the impression that the person that wrote the article believes that Universal Binaries are an AppStore-only feature.
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#14Always one guy who shouts about control and submission. Don't like it don't buy it?
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#15It will be interesting to see how long Rosetta-2 will be supported. macOS 10.15 took away 32bit apps, which was a sizeable chunk so clearly Apple is willing to alienate some of its users in the name of progress and slimlining.
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#16One thing I can credit Android some, and Windows a lot (even 10 with all its manifold privacy and user-hostility problems) with is that they are backwards compatible.
exceptions to every rule, etc., but I can run all old versions of Android apps on an Android 11 phone, same for Windows programs going back to 1996 or so with few tweaks, and can squeeze that back to 1993 if I fuss and cuss and so on.
yes, this is arch to arch emulation, but the idea od taking that feature away in ~4 years vs Android's best effort continued compatibility or Microsoft's compatibility layers is a cost/benefit that I apparently disagree with Apple decision makers on.
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#17While the point of Apple Silicon is undoubtedly for Apple to have more control over their ecosystem, this article doesn't make that point very well. For example: > However, there’s a clear nudge for developers to publish their recompiled apps to Apple’s store. That doesn't make any sense. Where is the "nudge" coming from? The article doesn't make any argument for how that works, given that you can share universal bin…
> That doesn't make any sense. Where is the "nudge" coming from? I had the impression that the person that wrote the article believes that Universal Binaries are an AppStore-only feature.
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#18Apple's marketing is brilliant. It really gets the kind of people who think they are too smart to be marketed to AND the normies, all in one message.
Re: Apple’s M1 silicon is all about platform control
#19Always one guy who shouts about control and submission. Don't like it don't buy it?
If you don't like slavery, just don't buy slaves. Nothing wrong with that, right? YoU hAvE oPtIonS aS a CoNsuMer.