I can’t read the article. I’m very interested, but Wired has become such a cesspool of popovers, pop ups, advertising, tracking, and general dark patterns that I just can’t go there... even with an ad blocker the experience is annoying and sucky. What happened to them?
The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
11–20 of 173 posts
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#12That's an attitude problem on the part of the developer. He shouldn't feel guilty for providing insufficient free support.
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#13Open source has become yet another way for big tech companies to exploit laborers. If you are an independent developer working on an open source project without a copy-left license, you are a fool.
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#14Open source has become yet another way for big tech companies to exploit laborers. If you are an independent developer working on an open source project without a copy-left license, you are a fool.
The language is a bit too extreme in my view. You release OSS knowing that anyone can come and pick it up. Even if they make a dime off your sweat. Pick your license, fine, but there's no reason for the devs to get upset about it because there's no lack of information out there. That being said, companies should kick down some love to the OSS projects they use. Especially big companies for which it's just a charitabl…
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#15I can’t read the article. I’m very interested, but Wired has become such a cesspool of popovers, pop ups, advertising, tracking, and general dark patterns that I just can’t go there... even with an ad blocker the experience is annoying and sucky. What happened to them?
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#16Open source has become yet another way for big tech companies to exploit laborers. If you are an independent developer working on an open source project without a copy-left license, you are a fool.
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#17Open source has become yet another way for big tech companies to exploit laborers. If you are an independent developer working on an open source project without a copy-left license, you are a fool.
Even with copyleft it's now a situation where AWS will do a cleanroom implementation of your API and neuter your market.
Re: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#18I can’t read the article. I’m very interested, but Wired has become such a cesspool of popovers, pop ups, advertising, tracking, and general dark patterns that I just can’t go there... even with an ad blocker the experience is annoying and sucky. What happened to them?
! row for wired
##.itemlist .athing:has(.sitestr:contains(wired.com))
! the following comments/etc links
##.itemlist .athing:has(.sitestr:contains(wired.com)) + tr
! the following spacer
##.itemlist .athing:has(.sitestr:contains(wired.com)) + tr + tr.spacerRe: The Few, the Tired, the Open Source Coders
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
The language is a bit too extreme in my view. You release OSS knowing that anyone can come and pick it up. Even if they make a dime off your sweat. Pick your license, fine, but there's no reason for the devs to get upset about it because there's no lack of information out there. That being said, companies should kick down some love to the OSS projects they use. Especially big companies for which it's just a charitabl…
At every company I've worked I've lobbied for us to make donations to open source projects we depend on. Every single time it quietly dies in legal. There must be a better way.
However I see two issues with this model: - the community will shit on it like it's not real OSS - big companies will start banning the use of such licenses
The other alternatives many are doing are paid support, priority issues for sponsors, paid for issues, etc.