Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hate to be cynical but here's to hoping it's not to destroy evidence.
The Feds have not seized the backend servers of these voting systems. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-election-syctl-... "DC Dirty Laundry" is, in general, not a reliable source for news. https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/DCD...
Dominion Voting Systems Patents
11–20 of 41 posts
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
The Feds have not seized the backend servers of these voting systems. https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-9754011363 https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-election-syctl-... "DC Dirty Laundry" is, in general, not a reliable source for news. https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/DCD...
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne... SHTF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E Enjoy the show.
Taking the president's attorney's word for it when there is no third party corroboration is like trusting Charles Manson's attorney when he says Charles Manson is innocent. Obvious conflict of interest on the source of the information.
Let's see some actual proof. So far nobody with any credibility, including the company that was ostensibly raided, claims a raid happened.
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne... SHTF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E Enjoy the show.
Taking the president's attorney's word for it when there is no third party corroboration is like trusting Charles Manson's attorney when he says Charles Manson is innocent. Obvious conflict of interest on the source of the information. Let's see some actual proof. So far nobody with any credibility, including the company that was ostensibly raided, claims a raid happened.
... in fact, she's no longer his lawyer.
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#14Earlier quoted context omitted.
Taking the president's attorney's word for it when there is no third party corroboration is like trusting Charles Manson's attorney when he says Charles Manson is innocent. Obvious conflict of interest on the source of the information. Let's see some actual proof. So far nobody with any credibility, including the company that was ostensibly raided, claims a raid happened.
... in fact, she's no longer his lawyer. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756
She never was his lawyer. She's a military prosecutor who can bring charges under the UCMJ.
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
... in fact, she's no longer his lawyer. https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2020-55040756
She never was his lawyer. She's a military prosecutor who can bring charges under the UCMJ.
> She never was his lawyer
Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained.
https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037...
And the UCMJ is irrelevant to the outcome of the election. With the sole exception of the process of collection of military overseas ballots, the election is an entirely civilian and mostly state-level process that has no involvement from the military.
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#16Earlier quoted context omitted.
She never was his lawyer. She's a military prosecutor who can bring charges under the UCMJ.
> She never was his lawyer Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037... And the UCMJ is irrelevant to the outcome of the election. With the sole exception of the process of collection of military overseas ballots, the election is an entirely civilian and mostly state-level process that has no involvement from the military.
A tweet by whoever is in charge of Trumps twitter account is considered accurate information?
"Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained."
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
> She never was his lawyer Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/13278115271231037... And the UCMJ is irrelevant to the outcome of the election. With the sole exception of the process of collection of military overseas ballots, the election is an entirely civilian and mostly state-level process that has no involvement from the military.
A tweet by whoever is in charge of Trumps twitter account is considered accurate information? "Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained."
As he allows the person running his Twitter account to speak for him, and does not correct the record, it can be considered primary source information.
(... it's pretty clear, however, that most of the time Trump is in charge of Trump's Twitter account)
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/huge-attorney-sidne... SHTF: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMIQbsTfH3E Enjoy the show.
Taking the president's attorney's word for it when there is no third party corroboration is like trusting Charles Manson's attorney when he says Charles Manson is innocent. Obvious conflict of interest on the source of the information. Let's see some actual proof. So far nobody with any credibility, including the company that was ostensibly raided, claims a raid happened.
I hear Gina H. is singing like a bird. After she was arrested, red-handed, during the raid. That's got to have some people really worried.
And as far as citing mainstream media goes, that's now like quoting CCP press releases, i.e. party propaganda.
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
A tweet by whoever is in charge of Trumps twitter account is considered accurate information? "Your relationship to facts is increasingly strained."
As he allows the person running his Twitter account to speak for him, and does not correct the record, it can be considered primary source information. (... it's pretty clear, however, that most of the time Trump is in charge of Trump's Twitter account)
This is almost hilarious. Half of everything on Twitter is disputed now, hadn't you heard?
Re: Dominion Voting Systems Patents
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
As he allows the person running his Twitter account to speak for him, and does not correct the record, it can be considered primary source information. (... it's pretty clear, however, that most of the time Trump is in charge of Trump's Twitter account)
This is almost hilarious. Half of everything on Twitter is disputed now, hadn't you heard?
Fine. Don't take the word of the President regarding who was on the President's "truly great team." The National Archives will log it as his words, as per their mandate to collect the writings of the President in his official capacity, but you don't have to believe them.
Then when we evaluate her claims, we still find them to be utterly baseless accusations, detached from demonstrable fact.
The court cases are being thrown out consistently, and the hearings in front of state legislatures have been downright embarrassing.