Certainly his right; his project (though it has a very permissive license), his time. It sounds like he's tired of working on it, and he requires sponsorship to make it worthwhile. Let's say he doesn't, and the project is forked. This begs an interesting question: does he own the npm name? "faker" has mindshare, not just in JS; if he's unwilling to work on it, would it make sense for the NPM organization to reassign…
No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
11–20 of 966 posts
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#12I'm curious what the motivation was for doing this now after supporting faker.js for 8+ years. Also, isn't faker.js a completed project? What is there to maintain?
Looks like people want new data generation, new generation interfaces.
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#13It's actually really sad that someone who has easily generated millions of dollars of value with their work gets nothing for it. Yeah yeah, it's open source, but it still sucks. I'm assuming they can't be compensated easily due to legal reasons?
They won't be compensated easily due to cheapness reasons. Anything legal is just an excuse (assuming Marak isn't on some terrorist blacklist or something).
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#14It's actually really sad that someone who has easily generated millions of dollars of value with their work gets nothing for it. Yeah yeah, it's open source, but it still sucks. I'm assuming they can't be compensated easily due to legal reasons?
There are also example of open source developers who have made a great living from their projects. That's on the developer to find a business model that works.
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#15It's actually really sad that someone who has easily generated millions of dollars of value with their work gets nothing for it. Yeah yeah, it's open source, but it still sucks. I'm assuming they can't be compensated easily due to legal reasons?
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#16Certainly his right; his project (though it has a very permissive license), his time. It sounds like he's tired of working on it, and he requires sponsorship to make it worthwhile. Let's say he doesn't, and the project is forked. This begs an interesting question: does he own the npm name? "faker" has mindshare, not just in JS; if he's unwilling to work on it, would it make sense for the NPM organization to reassign…
More likely, the fork would become "faker2" if they don't want to come up with a new name.
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#17I also hope the license is more restricted for commercial use.
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#18I'm curious what the motivation was for doing this now after supporting faker.js for 8+ years. Also, isn't faker.js a completed project? What is there to maintain?
Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#19Re: No More Free Work from Marak: Pay Me or Fork This
#20As an open source author or maintainer you don't do the work for others and then expect some kind of compensation. The idea instead is to do the work that you would have done anyway because somebody else paid you or because you did it for fun, and then you publish it to use the community to help you fix issues. A philantropic motivation is nice but not necessary and just a minor side effect. And just as you don't have an obligation to help does nobody have an obligation to help you either.
That's why I like the term "open source" better than the original "free software". If you get the root motivation that RMS had for the "freedom" aspect of it, then that's the same thing, but too many people read it as "for free". Like apparently the author of this article. And that's just wrong.