Live data from Hacker News

How the Presidential Candidates Spy on Their Supporters

indicative.com

11–14 of 14 posts

Re: How the Presidential Candidates Spy on Their Supporters

#11
post #9

One of the best parts: Time will tell how effective each campaign manages to turn data, analytics, ads, and fundraising dollars into actual votes on Election Day

there is certainly room for savings/efficiency. I've 100% made my mind up, but my mailbox has been BOMBARDED with giant-format postcards promoting the candidates I'm already voting for.

These can not be cheap to print and deliver, and as such they are an enormous waste of money; money that could be used to educate/inform/persuade voters who are undecided or registered with a different political party.

I wonder if a thousand years from now, archeologists digging tough landfills will see a 4-year-periodically-repeating-layer (like a geological sedimentary layer) of these mailings and wonder "what was that all about?"

Re: How the Presidential Candidates Spy on Their Supporters

#12
post #7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Just shows that they know all about spying on people.

One could argue that if they really knew what they were doing, they wouldn't be in a blocklist in the first place.

Or maybe they did a cost benefit analysis.

Re: How the Presidential Candidates Spy on Their Supporters

#13

Ironic that indicative.com is on multiple blocklists? easyprivacy, adaway, pihole, netguard...

They're a customer analytics platform with an SDK available, so their customers can track their websites. That's probably why they're showing up on blocklists, tbf.
Post reply on HN