Live data from Hacker News

Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

atlasobscura.com

11–20 of 31 posts

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#11

My partner loves hot pot, so I bought her a home hot pot kit for Christmas last year. At first she didn’t want to use it at all which was disappointing, but then it become a huge hit when all the restaurants closed down for Covid. Home hot pot has now turned into our fun date night tradition on Friday’s where we eat together for a few hours while talking. Here’s our list of ingredients we like if anyone is curious. W…

You can also try adding fish balls (can find at Asian supermarkets). Another is Napa cabbage - it sounds quite plain but is surprisingly good in a hot pot. Also try getting a fish based bbq sauce (it’s a Taiwanese brand), and mixing that with sesame oil, soy sauce, chili oil, ginger/green onions/cilantro/garlic, finely chopped. For noodles, I would use udon, hands down. Lastly, adding steamed rice to the broth at the end with beaten egg to make a congee is excellent.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#12

My partner loves hot pot, so I bought her a home hot pot kit for Christmas last year. At first she didn’t want to use it at all which was disappointing, but then it become a huge hit when all the restaurants closed down for Covid. Home hot pot has now turned into our fun date night tradition on Friday’s where we eat together for a few hours while talking. Here’s our list of ingredients we like if anyone is curious. W…

Are lotus roots the ones that come as very flat circles? Was introduced to them the first time I ever had hot pot -- SO good.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#13
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I've tried the 温泉卵 onsen tamago( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onsen_tamago ). The one I had was kind of over cooked and had a sulfur taste. Wasn't great. In Iceland they also use the hotsprings to cook bread: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vz-7iUw8Sl0

Well, whether your egg will have a sulphuric taste will depend on whether the onsen you went to had sulphuric water.

No, just cooking an egg for a long time at high temperatures will bring out the sulfur taste. Try boiling an egg for 15 minutes.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#14
post #7

Obviously no. It is a stupid idea from Jungian and Froidian "psychology" that symbols have been invented once and then propagated everywhere, and that this supposed propagation is an evidence of migration pathways and relationship. Same stupidity goes with linguistics - if something is called by the same name in the different parts of the world, there must be an infallible evidence of migration and relation. No, ever…

I fail to see how this is "obvious." By the logic that nature invents things many times, isn't it possible some humans at some point did this? Obviously they didn't call it "hot pot," the article doesn't actually suggest that, it's used as a shortcut in a headline to communicate a point. Your suggestion of a link to Jung and Freud makes no sense to me...

Generally speaking, humanities was a mistake. These "scientists" memed the main principle of science from scientific evidence to scientific, or more precisely - sectarian consensus.

Peer review is not by any means criterion for even approximation to the truth. The article in question should have been reviewed exactly like I did.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#16
post #3

Later humans in Japan did using onsen, which is basically the same thing IIRC: http://www.bbc.com/travel/story/20200824-the-japanese-villag... Definitely plausible.

In Iceland they bury bread dough in little boxes near hot springs and bake sulfur-flavored rye bread

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%BAgbrau%C3%B0?wprov=sfla1

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#17
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I fail to see how this is "obvious." By the logic that nature invents things many times, isn't it possible some humans at some point did this? Obviously they didn't call it "hot pot," the article doesn't actually suggest that, it's used as a shortcut in a headline to communicate a point. Your suggestion of a link to Jung and Freud makes no sense to me...

Generally speaking, humanities was a mistake. These "scientists" memed the main principle of science from scientific evidence to scientific, or more precisely - sectarian consensus. Peer review is not by any means criterion for even approximation to the truth. The article in question should have been reviewed exactly like I did.

You'll excuse me when I say you sound like you have zero experience at reputable levels of academic "humanities".

Humanities are not exact sciences for a single reason - they comprise too many variables for a primate brain to reason about. There's no god mandated set of borders defining "types" of science.

There are fields so complex that they have to be dealt in so high an abstraction level that we call them subjective. Absolutely does not mean that the objects they study are unworthy of study. Precisely the opposite, in fact.

Also does not mean that, even if a portion of people are faking, there are no valuable insights coming from the scientific field.

I'll point out that there are a huge number of "fake efforts" in the hard sciences as well. Cost of doing science at scale with bad incentive engines.

Finally, if your issue with the "humanities" is with a perceived politization of the academia, I'd suggest formally educating yourself in those subjects and taking a place in said politics instead of, you know, acting like a reactionary teen or twentysumthin. No offense, but complaining about politization from the outside is a useless venting effort.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#18
post #11

My partner loves hot pot, so I bought her a home hot pot kit for Christmas last year. At first she didn’t want to use it at all which was disappointing, but then it become a huge hit when all the restaurants closed down for Covid. Home hot pot has now turned into our fun date night tradition on Friday’s where we eat together for a few hours while talking. Here’s our list of ingredients we like if anyone is curious. W…

You can also try adding fish balls (can find at Asian supermarkets). Another is Napa cabbage - it sounds quite plain but is surprisingly good in a hot pot. Also try getting a fish based bbq sauce (it’s a Taiwanese brand), and mixing that with sesame oil, soy sauce, chili oil, ginger/green onions/cilantro/garlic, finely chopped. For noodles, I would use udon, hands down. Lastly, adding steamed rice to the broth at the…

Do you mean this one? This is one of my favorite sauce.

https://www.99ranch.com/zh-hant/shop/condiments_and_spices/s...

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#19
post #12

My partner loves hot pot, so I bought her a home hot pot kit for Christmas last year. At first she didn’t want to use it at all which was disappointing, but then it become a huge hit when all the restaurants closed down for Covid. Home hot pot has now turned into our fun date night tradition on Friday’s where we eat together for a few hours while talking. Here’s our list of ingredients we like if anyone is curious. W…

Are lotus roots the ones that come as very flat circles? Was introduced to them the first time I ever had hot pot -- SO good.

Yeah, with discs with holes in them.

Re: Did Early Humans Invent Hot Pot in Geothermal Pools?

#20
post #17

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Generally speaking, humanities was a mistake. These "scientists" memed the main principle of science from scientific evidence to scientific, or more precisely - sectarian consensus. Peer review is not by any means criterion for even approximation to the truth. The article in question should have been reviewed exactly like I did.

You'll excuse me when I say you sound like you have zero experience at reputable levels of academic "humanities". Humanities are not exact sciences for a single reason - they comprise too many variables for a primate brain to reason about. There's no god mandated set of borders defining "types" of science. There are fields so complex that they have to be dealt in so high an abstraction level that we call them subject…

I suggest not to assume anything about other people.

I have studied religions among other things, so I know very well what sectarian consensus is and how exactly it works to maintain a high social status.

Humanities and theoretical"sciences" are sects by every possible definition.

I have studied philosophy too.

Post reply on HN