Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...
Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
11–20 of 36 posts
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#12At this point, Google is beyond reason and is openly hypocritical. Open source? Yes. Open platforms? No. Even if they are competing against YouTube. Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content if not the former is now worse than LBRY and Google still gave Netflix a pass. If LBRY had the same content as Netflix and YouTube, Google would choose to ban LBRY 10,000 over, with the same reason.
> Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content What?
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#13I think people believe there is no alternative. I always write on these types of cases that distributed protocols are an alternative. I just get buried with no explanation.
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#14Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...
They also reserve the right to selectively enforce those provisions so don't expect any of those to actually be banned. Maybe your reports can be used as evidence in some future anti-trust trial though.
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content What?
Cuties.
The outrage over Cuties is some of the weirdest situations of political/cultural toxoplasma I've seen.
The movie has nothing that's considered abnormal to what pre-teens and teens are exposed and engage in modern western culture. Girls are exposed to the dances/ect that sexualize them everywhere from social media platforms (tiktok, ect) and in person (regular middle school/high school stuff). The dances in cuties are very meh in by those measurements.
The movie tries to take a look at this, "norm," and displays something that's somewhat normal in a movie format. It's especially weird that the movie got it's backlash from conservatives b/c the message is arguably somewhat conservative.
The story is a girl coming from a extremely conservative background embracing the supposedly pro-women modern liberal western culture. By showing this the character and the viewers question if modern western cultural attitudes to women and their sexualization is actually better than the treatment of women in conservative cultures.
SPOILERS: It ends with the character embracing some sort of middle path that leaves you asking if that's even possible.
Like if you believe in the backlash against Cuties and the sexualization of the kids in modern society, that backlash should be more directed a backlash against places like tiktok/ect that encourage pre-teens/teens to copy/perform sexualized dances for money/street cred.
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#16Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...
It is annoyingly hard to find any good English articles about it but here is a Danish one https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/kultur/google-slettede-drs-app-til...
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#17Not sure what all of the cellphone vendors who have forked Android "just in case Google become anti-competitive" are waiting for... this is clearly the moment.
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#18Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...
Found the Scandinavian, I think! Because it's Google, NPR/PBS or even just Netflix would probably work even more efficiently.
Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#19Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
Cuties.
A tangent about Cuties, but felt like airing my thoughts on this somewhere. The outrage over Cuties is some of the weirdest situations of political/cultural toxoplasma I've seen. The movie has nothing that's considered abnormal to what pre-teens and teens are exposed and engage in modern western culture. Girls are exposed to the dances/ect that sexualize them everywhere from social media platforms (tiktok, ect) and i…