Live data from Hacker News

Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

reclaimthenet.org

11–20 of 36 posts

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#11
post #4

Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...

They also reserve the right to selectively enforce those provisions so don't expect any of those to actually be banned. Maybe your reports can be used as evidence in some future anti-trust trial though.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#12
post #3

At this point, Google is beyond reason and is openly hypocritical. Open source? Yes. Open platforms? No. Even if they are competing against YouTube. Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content if not the former is now worse than LBRY and Google still gave Netflix a pass. If LBRY had the same content as Netflix and YouTube, Google would choose to ban LBRY 10,000 over, with the same reason.

> Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content What?

Cuties.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#13
There is obviously a structural problem with them owning the marketplace that they are competing in.

I think people believe there is no alternative. I always write on these types of cases that distributed protocols are an alternative. I just get buried with no explanation.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#14
post #11
post #4

Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...

They also reserve the right to selectively enforce those provisions so don't expect any of those to actually be banned. Maybe your reports can be used as evidence in some future anti-trust trial though.

Report the apps then report your reports to the Attorney General in your state? Might help. Even some Democratic AGs are signing onto antitrust suits against google.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Netflix and Youtube has disgusting content What?

Cuties.

A tangent about Cuties, but felt like airing my thoughts on this somewhere.

The outrage over Cuties is some of the weirdest situations of political/cultural toxoplasma I've seen.

The movie has nothing that's considered abnormal to what pre-teens and teens are exposed and engage in modern western culture. Girls are exposed to the dances/ect that sexualize them everywhere from social media platforms (tiktok, ect) and in person (regular middle school/high school stuff). The dances in cuties are very meh in by those measurements.

The movie tries to take a look at this, "norm," and displays something that's somewhat normal in a movie format. It's especially weird that the movie got it's backlash from conservatives b/c the message is arguably somewhat conservative.

The story is a girl coming from a extremely conservative background embracing the supposedly pro-women modern liberal western culture. By showing this the character and the viewers question if modern western cultural attitudes to women and their sexualization is actually better than the treatment of women in conservative cultures.

SPOILERS: It ends with the character embracing some sort of middle path that leaves you asking if that's even possible.

Like if you believe in the backlash against Cuties and the sexualization of the kids in modern society, that backlash should be more directed a backlash against places like tiktok/ect that encourage pre-teens/teens to copy/perform sexualized dances for money/street cred.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#16
post #4

Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...

Not long ago they had removed the childrens TV app from DR because of similar reasons. I think some of the reasons were that there was a character who "smokes" a licorice pipes, and another who is a pirate that fights with ninjas. DR got the app back on there after its removal being condemned by MPs and ministers.

It is annoyingly hard to find any good English articles about it but here is a Danish one https://www.dr.dk/nyheder/kultur/google-slettede-drs-app-til...

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#17

Not sure what all of the cellphone vendors who have forked Android "just in case Google become anti-competitive" are waiting for... this is clearly the moment.

Well, check the Android licensing model. All Google services included or Huawei who are currently struggling.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#18
post #4

Here are the content policies: https://play.google.com/about/developer-content-policy/ Perhaps someone should try and report apps from big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc). It shouldn't be hard to find some TV programmes on there that contains "sexual content and profanity". Reporting is done here: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/cont...

> big national public service broadcasting stations (BBC, DR, NRK, SVT, etc)

Found the Scandinavian, I think! Because it's Google, NPR/PBS or even just Netflix would probably work even more efficiently.

Re: Google stifles YouTube competitor LBRY, banning it for pedantic reasons

#20
post #15
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Cuties.

A tangent about Cuties, but felt like airing my thoughts on this somewhere. The outrage over Cuties is some of the weirdest situations of political/cultural toxoplasma I've seen. The movie has nothing that's considered abnormal to what pre-teens and teens are exposed and engage in modern western culture. Girls are exposed to the dances/ect that sexualize them everywhere from social media platforms (tiktok, ect) and i…

It's a movie rated "mature" featuring sexualized depictions of 11 year old girls. 11 year olds (the only even remotely "appropriate" audience for the film) can't legally watch it. It's a film filmed by pedophiles for pedophiles, and its ratings reflect that. Fun fact: 4chan, which lets you post swastikas, porn, and gore all day long _censors_ Cuties screenshots, since it does not allow child porn.
Post reply on HN