This is a poorly-worded argument, and I’m not surprised they lost. I’m no fan of domain squatters or speculators, but spase.io doesn’t pass the burden of proof here. Is is annoying that someone is sitting on spase.com for many years and refusing to do anything with it except sell it to someone who will pay their premium? Yes. Is that illegal. Ehhhh.
Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
11–18 of 18 posts
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#12This is a poorly-worded argument, and I’m not surprised they lost. I’m no fan of domain squatters or speculators, but spase.io doesn’t pass the burden of proof here. Is is annoying that someone is sitting on spase.com for many years and refusing to do anything with it except sell it to someone who will pay their premium? Yes. Is that illegal . Ehhhh.
Did you see there was evidence brought forward that the domain was bought in bad faith??
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#13I like
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#14The year bought is not the only thing that matters. Other factors include history of squatting. And whether the domain was bought in bad faith
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#15TLDR; someone is trying to use Twitter mob tactics to get what they want.
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#16Although I hate domain squatters I can’t see what the precise problem is. This company has a domain name in .io. space but wants one in .com. space. Not an unreasonable wish but it feels like a stretch to be a right IMHO. There was some stuff about unreasonable claims made by the squatter and that doesn’t sound good but as this is a trying of tweets rather than a paragraph of text it was hard to follow.
Perhaps you and some others will find threaderapp helpful for the aesthetic point https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1309503585470701568.html
It’s not an aesthetic point by a functional one. In regular twitter, instead of reading running text you read a snippet and then have to hold the context in your head as you skip down to find the subsequent tweet. Thread reader eliminates part of that overhead but the resulting text is still choppy as a result of twitter’s constraints.
I am not complaining about twitter’s constraints per se — you can like it or not. But it works against the needs of making a coherent argument or narrative that requires context to be maintained (“on the stack” as it were) in order to understand subsequent statements.
Running text allows you to enter a brief “flow” state to get both Gestalt and detail. Sure, you can break an essay into chunks but you can also commute to work in a tank. Just because it’s possible doesn’t mean using the wrong tool is effective or convenient.
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#17This is a poorly-worded argument, and I’m not surprised they lost. I’m no fan of domain squatters or speculators, but spase.io doesn’t pass the burden of proof here. Is is annoying that someone is sitting on spase.com for many years and refusing to do anything with it except sell it to someone who will pay their premium? Yes. Is that illegal . Ehhhh.
Did you see there was evidence brought forward that the domain was bought in bad faith??
What sort of bad faith?
Re: Adventures in Dealing with Domain Squatters
#18This is a poorly-worded argument, and I’m not surprised they lost. I’m no fan of domain squatters or speculators, but spase.io doesn’t pass the burden of proof here. Is is annoying that someone is sitting on spase.com for many years and refusing to do anything with it except sell it to someone who will pay their premium? Yes. Is that illegal . Ehhhh.
Did you see there was evidence brought forward that the domain was bought in bad faith??
In 2005?