Interesting. Seems fairly comparable to the Sonoff Basic (also ESP8266, retails around $5), but more DIY friendly. Are you planning to sell a case to go with it?
We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
11–20 of 145 posts
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#12Pretty rad! I could see lots of applications. Available on amazon you say? 19.99 you say? https://www.amazon.com/dp/B08GY2GTW5?ref=myi_title_dp I'm curious about availability. Are they ready to ship? Awaiting preorders? EDIT: Oh I see 18 in stock. Probably remains of a small run to gauge interest. I hope it takes off. I'm going to make it 17. :-)
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#13Earlier quoted context omitted.
> * Is it FCC-certified? It would certainly appear to lack the FCC ID label/marking it is required to have if it is FCC certified. So probably not. Thus, it also appears doubtful whether it can legally be marketed or sold in the U.S.
IANAL, But I think device as-is can likely be sold and marketed perfectly fine. Test-kit and dev-kit stuff is regulated a bit differently under the assumption that it's not going to be in mass use, and also that it's likely going to be used to develop another product that will get the fcc certification. https://emcfastpass.com/fcc-rules-kits-subassemblies/
"Based on the definition above, it looks clear that non-authorized kits that are intended to form a complete product when fully constructed are technically not legally permitted to be sold in the US. That is because if you are marketing and selling a kit to an end user, which the user will then build into a full product, there is no reason to suspect that the normal rules would not apply."
The subassembly rules could work, if they apply, but I don't see how this product fits the definition of a sub-assembly:
"No authorization is required for a peripheral device or a subassembly that is sold to an equipment manufacturer for further fabrication."
In fact, I think it's a stretch to say that any of these test-kit, dev equipment, or subassembly rules apply. This basically strikes me as being marketed as a consumer product -- albeit a product for very tech savvy consumers.
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#14Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#15Cool board! The only thing I think would be a nice-to-have is an integrated wifi module.
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#16Cool board! The only thing I think would be a nice-to-have is an integrated wifi module.
doesn't esp8266 have wifi built in?
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#17What is an "ESP8266 board"? Is that something that is so common it doesn't need explaining? Of course I will google it [and probably buy one], but just pointing out that it's not very clear from the website!
[EDIT: ok, after 10 minutes of googlin', it seems no one will explain what it is - it's just "an esp8266 system on a chip". It must be the first rule of ESP8266 club...]
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#18Is the antenna open source? Is it characterized (bandwidth, efficiency, radiation pattern)? Almost like one from here: https://www.ti.com/lit/an/swra351a/swra351a.pdf
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#19$19.99 seems a bit expensive to me though.
Re: We made an open source ESP8266 dev board for makers
#20I have an interest in electronics and would call myself a "maker" (well, I have a growing box filled with various arduinos and microcontrollers)... but after scouring the repo and the website, I can't figure out what this is, or what I could do with it! What is an "ESP8266 board"? Is that something that is so common it doesn't need explaining? Of course I will google it [and probably buy one], but just pointing out t…