According to the page, from green to red does not subtract any point but running twice the tests with errors subtract 5 points? Kind of arbitrary rules that have nothing to do with TDD if you ask me.
A virtual pet that helps you raise your TDD practice.
11–15 of 15 posts
Adding an intentionally-failing test a part of the regular flow. TDD 101.
Re: A virtual pet that helps you raise your TDD practice.
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I think HN has seen enough snarky comments for a while. I would request everyone try and abstain from content-free comments.
I think HN has seen enough comments telling everyone else how to behave. Edit: Apparently folks like being told what to do. shrug Carry on then.
I think that's a misrepresentation. HN has enjoyed a long run as a forum with a professional vibe. Its owner, and the core constituency, do not intend to let it become the next Slashdot/Fark/Digg/Reddit. You can find more background here:
Re: A virtual pet that helps you raise your TDD practice.
#13According to the page, from green to red does not subtract any point but running twice the tests with errors subtract 5 points? Kind of arbitrary rules that have nothing to do with TDD if you ask me.
Adding an intentionally-failing test a part of the regular flow. TDD 101.
Yes, but how core is "don't ever write more than one test at a time"?
Re: A virtual pet that helps you raise your TDD practice.
#14Programming has jumped the shark.
While I disagree with the tone of this comment, I have to admit my first thought was "TDD has jumped the shark". The last thing I want is some random critter getting happier or angrier based on the results of my testing. I don't want "Agile Clippy", thanks.
Re: A virtual pet that helps you raise your TDD practice.
#15If we assume that this would legitimately motivate a developer to change their behavior, it seems like it would just incentivize them to run tests less frequently.