Live data from Hacker News

Twitter Tweets Some Big Q1 Stats; 155 Million Tweets A Day Now

techcrunch.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Twitter Tweets Some Big Q1 Stats; 155 Million Tweets A Day Now

#11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did see the Fail Whale once or twice last week and my client (TweetDeck) occasionally hits API errors, so it isn't perfected quite yet. But handling 1800 tweets a second and pushing them to real-time streams is no small task.

handling 1800 tweets a second [...] is no small task It's funny how people consistently overestimate that. Actually, yes, it is a fairly trivial task and there's no justification for failwhaling over it when you have money to buy competent developers. Many companies process orders of magnitudes more than that, under much harder constraints and much more complex requirements (think financial industry and telecoms).

It's funny how people who haven't built similar systems underestimate how difficult it is, Mr/Mrs Anonymous Internet Tough Person.

Phone companies and financial institutions don't typically have messages which affect millions of accounts, for a start.

Re: Twitter Tweets Some Big Q1 Stats; 155 Million Tweets A Day Now

#12
Well, this metric doesn't say anything about profit or profitability, even indirectly. It also doesn't say anything about number of users or active users as I expect a large portion of these new tweets to be made by bots.

It does tell me that Twitter has the infrastructure to handle the server load which I guess is somewhat interesting, but not much..

Re: Twitter Tweets Some Big Q1 Stats; 155 Million Tweets A Day Now

#13
post #11
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

handling 1800 tweets a second [...] is no small task It's funny how people consistently overestimate that. Actually, yes, it is a fairly trivial task and there's no justification for failwhaling over it when you have money to buy competent developers. Many companies process orders of magnitudes more than that, under much harder constraints and much more complex requirements (think financial industry and telecoms).

It's funny how people who haven't built similar systems underestimate how difficult it is, Mr/Mrs Anonymous Internet Tough Person. Phone companies and financial institutions don't typically have messages which affect millions of accounts, for a start.

Actually I have built similar systems, on a smaller scale.

Phone companies and financial institutions don't typically have messages which affect millions of accounts, for a start.

You're saying that as if it was a relevant metric. It's not. What matters is the number of concurrently online subscribers and the aggregate throughput. Twitter doesn't go and append to 1mio inboxes when akutcher sends a tweet.

Post reply on HN