Stepping away from open source
11–20 of 34 posts
Re: Stepping away from open source
#12It's a viable alternative to Spotify IMO as one use.
It's basically free Youtube Red. Really sad to hear this, hope the creator is better off for it though.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#13For anyone unfamiliar, Invidious is just Youtube without ads and it lets you turn the screen off on mobile. It also lets you turn videos to an "audio only" mode for speed/bandwidth. It's a viable alternative to Spotify IMO as one use. It's basically free Youtube Red. Really sad to hear this, hope the creator is better off for it though.
Indeed. I've been using it to play background music for D&D, no more annoying adds.
I may well wind up hosting an instance following this.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#14Note that https://invidio.us is not the only instance, just the most popular one. You can host your own, or use one of the others: https://instances.invidio.us
It's written in Crystal.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#15The main instances are so unreliable that I just run my own.
They seem to host a lot of other services as well, such as searx, nitter and bibliogram. I mainly use their searx instance and it is my primary search provider.
They also have hidden .onion instances iirc.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#16Oh that's a shame. > The API will continue to function until October 1st, to give time for any services relying on it to migrate to other solutions. Aw no. I was thinking about using invidio.us in my own projects but now I guess I won't! I have need of a YouTube streaming server, backend only, which I can embed on a web page. I made my own with youtubedown and bash but maintaining it is a pain since YouTube is always…
For your own projects, I would recommend relying on multiple instances anyway because if one has downtime you could just use another one.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#17Oh that's a shame. > The API will continue to function until October 1st, to give time for any services relying on it to migrate to other solutions. Aw no. I was thinking about using invidio.us in my own projects but now I guess I won't! I have need of a YouTube streaming server, backend only, which I can embed on a web page. I made my own with youtubedown and bash but maintaining it is a pain since YouTube is always…
There are many alternative instances, that's the great thing about projects like invidious. https://instances.invidio.us For your own projects, I would recommend relying on multiple instances anyway because if one has downtime you could just use another one.
I just need to remember not to be lazy and to continue maintaining my fork of youtubedown. The only obstacle for me is I really don't use YouTube frequently so mostly it's a matter of remembering to do the necessary maintenance.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#18As the maintainer of a relatively large OSS platform (OpenFaaS), I also wrote up about this last year too. For anyone who can't relate to omarroth's statement, it might help with perspective: https://blog.alexellis.io/the-5-pressures-of-leadership/
Re: Stepping away from open source
#19Invidious is such a treasure and something I do not want to see go by the wayside. I would like to think, for whoever is available to work on the project with the time in energy, there could be enough support to keep this going via donations.
There have been other alternatives in the past and there will be other alternatives in the future. I've found the most reliable option is to run my own and not rely on someone else's service which can break at any time and disappear at any time. Interfacing with YouTube in any unofficial way is fraught with peril by its very nature because YouTube is always trying to stop it.
Invidious I found to be uniquely and particularly convenient because, for a while at least, it ran like any other website and I could skip the steps needed to self host.
Re: Stepping away from open source
#20For anyone unfamiliar, Invidious is just Youtube without ads and it lets you turn the screen off on mobile. It also lets you turn videos to an "audio only" mode for speed/bandwidth. It's a viable alternative to Spotify IMO as one use. It's basically free Youtube Red. Really sad to hear this, hope the creator is better off for it though.