Live data from Hacker News

The worst tool for the job

johndcook.com

11–20 of 196 posts

Re: The worst tool for the job

#11
The "job" here is drawing diagrams that describe a set of interrelated parts and Adobe Illustrator is not a tool for that job.

The first thing you need to make the kind of illustrations he's making are the ability to automatically route the lines in a way that doesn't look embarrassingly bad. (Not the Bezier curves that Powerpoint comes with)

The other problem is how to lay out the boxes so that the diagram tells a story and that is a matter of elbow grease and having pride in your work.

All of the time somebody shows us a hairball of 10^6 nodes that have 10^8 connections or so and expects to get praise for it. If the culprit is lucky they might make the cover of Scientific American or something, but nobody is the wiser after looking at that type of diagram.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#12
post #2

What a great principle. One of those things I've felt for a long time but never express so well as John did. This idea extends to many other things, like... sports equipment. Beginner runners/bikers/skateboarders/whatever will not really feel the difference between equipment that cost $100 and $1,000, so get the cheap one and use it to (its) death. If you're still into the sport by then, go ahead and get the nicer on…

I use a similar heuristic that I’ve dubbed the 90% rule. In many cases, you can buy something that is 90% as good as the best product available for two thirds or even half the cost.

If you want the very best, though, you have to pay through the nose. Ergo, you should always try the cheaper product first.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#13
post #4

Eh, something to be said for mid-range too. I have a 12v cordless drill. Ended up saving me tons of work over the years but by no means either the best or the worst. Musical instruments. The low-end ones tend to be true disasters. Mid-range CPUs and GPUs are wonderful. Kitchen mixers, knives, screwdrivers, soldering irons, drill presses, etc. Plenty of times the worst tool is so obviously terrible that you probably s…

Well one caveat: at some point, you reach a level of expertise such that you can evaluate tools for yourself, and don't need rules of thumb like this. At that point a mid-grade tool might make sense.

I do have some expertise in some of the areas you mentioned, and disagree with you:

Musical instruments: if you're starting off on guitar, get a used Yamaha for $80 and spend as much money as you can on lessons. It's better to be a virtuoso with a Yamaha than to have a high-end Martin you can't play collecting dust in your attic. I have been given more than one expensive guitar because people heard me play and thought I'd get more out of the guitar than they were getting out of it.

Bikes: I got a fixed-gear bike for $90 to use as a daily commuter. A month in, I was tired of getting flats, so I replaced the tires with Continental Gatorskins which cost more than the bike originally did. After that, the bike lasted me >5 years without modification, only occasional tune-ups. I got rid of the bike because I was bored with it, not because there was anything wrong with it, and paid $250 for a system that was functionally the same but looked a bit nicer--the only real upgrade was a Brooks Leather saddle. Tons of bike messengers are running similar systems far harder than I am.

Both music and biking have somewhat snobby subcultures that will talk crap on cheap gear to justify their own lavish purchases, but ultimately nobody can say anything about what guitar you're playing when you bust out Paranoid Android or what bike you're riding when you zip past them. Skills beat gear every time.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#14
post #2

What a great principle. One of those things I've felt for a long time but never express so well as John did. This idea extends to many other things, like... sports equipment. Beginner runners/bikers/skateboarders/whatever will not really feel the difference between equipment that cost $100 and $1,000, so get the cheap one and use it to (its) death. If you're still into the sport by then, go ahead and get the nicer on…

Came here to say this. I've recently bought the cheapest bicycle and stand-up paddleboard I could find, precisely because of that reason. I don't know if the hobbies will "stick". Can always invest more later.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#15
This reminds me of Nassim Taleb's barbell strategy.

Basically, combine a low-risk strategy with a high-risk-high-reward strategy and avoid medium risk. That way, if the high-risk strategy fails, you won't be completely ruined, but if the high-risk strategy succeeds, you'll have a big reward.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#17
post #4

Eh, something to be said for mid-range too. I have a 12v cordless drill. Ended up saving me tons of work over the years but by no means either the best or the worst. Musical instruments. The low-end ones tend to be true disasters. Mid-range CPUs and GPUs are wonderful. Kitchen mixers, knives, screwdrivers, soldering irons, drill presses, etc. Plenty of times the worst tool is so obviously terrible that you probably s…

> I have a 12v cordless drill. Ended up saving me tons of work over the years but by no means either the best or the worst

But are there cheaper drills that do the same?

Re: The worst tool for the job

#18
post #16

I'm not happy with the premise that 'best' means 'most expensive' as i'm pretty sure anyone involved with software will undoubtably know - Oracle anyone? :)

There's a definite link between aggressive sales and how terrible a product is.

Re: The worst tool for the job

#19
post #2

What a great principle. One of those things I've felt for a long time but never express so well as John did. This idea extends to many other things, like... sports equipment. Beginner runners/bikers/skateboarders/whatever will not really feel the difference between equipment that cost $100 and $1,000, so get the cheap one and use it to (its) death. If you're still into the sport by then, go ahead and get the nicer on…

If you have the money, why waste it on low quality goods that will break? Buy better stuff instead and sell it or give it away when you find you don't use it anymore!

Quality, mid range equipment. Not luxury.

(The examples are unfortunate. For a runner it might suffice with $100 worth of equipment but not for a cyclist.)

Re: The worst tool for the job

#20
I do this a different way. I think about how much I'm going to use something and try my best to over-invest in what is typically cheap and could last years and under-invest (or avoid all together) in what is expensive or could last less than a year.

Pen: Very expensive.

Sunglasses: Very expensive.

Phone: Very expensive.

Laptop: Very expensive.

Shoes / most clothing: Midrange, since they don't last long, but they're not that expensive in the first place.

Car: Non-existent.

Housing: Far cheaper than I could afford.

Same thing when it comes to tools. I'll buy an expensive utility knife and a cheap jackhammer. Unless I were going to jackhammer for a living, it isn't used much and it's a reasonably expensive tool in the first place so why over pay for it?

Post reply on HN