Live data from Hacker News

Self Hosting Email Server

garron.blog

11–20 of 28 posts

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#11
post #10

OpenSMTPd is simple enough to setup on your own. No need for gigantic ‘dockerized’ email packages where it is virtually impossible to understand what is going on.

But i want imap too, and a web-mail, oh and a Calendar and contact (with team-functionality) too, synchronize them to my phone, and i want sieve functionality, anti-spam, and because it's written a pseudo antivirus-solution. And a self-service solution so users can reset the password with 2FA...still easy?

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#12
post #7

I was a mail administrator for around 10 years in a fairly small business and I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email. My old employer contacted me because a system I had built finally died and they wanted to build a new one. Once I got over the shock that they had still been using it I suggested going with a hosted solution. I mean they’re relatively cheap for good service and avoids a world of…

> I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email

resisting mass surveillance

Also, whatever value Clinton saw in self-hosting.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#13
post #2

Why did whoever think #FFFFFF text on the #000000 background is a good idea?

The other commenters here are right about the importance of text contrast, but there is a consensus in typography that pure white on pure black contributes to eye strain and decreased stamina when reading. This is especially true for people with astigmatism who experience a glowing effect around the letters known as halation. While there is room here for both personal preference and accessibility needs for a true 21:1 contrast ratio, a better default would be to use a white on a dark gray background. Supporting a dark mode design is a lot harder than just inverting the colors, which this site appears to fall short on.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#14
post #12
post #7

I was a mail administrator for around 10 years in a fairly small business and I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email. My old employer contacted me because a system I had built finally died and they wanted to build a new one. Once I got over the shock that they had still been using it I suggested going with a hosted solution. I mean they’re relatively cheap for good service and avoids a world of…

> I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email resisting mass surveillance Also, whatever value Clinton saw in self-hosting.

The main use case was to support her Blackberry.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#15
post #12
post #7

I was a mail administrator for around 10 years in a fairly small business and I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email. My old employer contacted me because a system I had built finally died and they wanted to build a new one. Once I got over the shock that they had still been using it I suggested going with a hosted solution. I mean they’re relatively cheap for good service and avoids a world of…

> I can’t imagine why anyone would want to host their own email resisting mass surveillance Also, whatever value Clinton saw in self-hosting.

> Also, whatever value Clinton saw in self-hosting.

I assume it was to prevent FOIA requests which is not a big risk for the majority of us.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#16
post #11
post #10

OpenSMTPd is simple enough to setup on your own. No need for gigantic ‘dockerized’ email packages where it is virtually impossible to understand what is going on.

But i want imap too, and a web-mail, oh and a Calendar and contact (with team-functionality) too, synchronize them to my phone, and i want sieve functionality, anti-spam, and because it's written a pseudo antivirus-solution. And a self-service solution so users can reset the password with 2FA...still easy?

Yes, generally if you over-complicate something it becomes over-complicated.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#17
Not to nitpick but I think that the part about the spf record isn’t that great.

The typical spf record has ip addresses, blocks of ip addresses, or hosts but I don’t think just v=spf1 mx ~all.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#18
I’m a huge fan of Zimbra, dedicated all-in-one mail solution using your favorite software under the hood that doesn’t take much knowledge to administer. Plus you have support you can fall back on.

Downsides: ui starting to show its age. No container support.

Re: Self Hosting Email Server

#19

Not to nitpick but I think that the part about the spf record isn’t that great. The typical spf record has ip addresses, blocks of ip addresses, or hosts but I don’t think just v=spf1 mx ~all.

Not for simple setups. If the same servers are used for both ingoing and outgoing, "mx" is all you want or really need.

If you use a third-party hosting service for webmail, IMAP, etc, where they might also handle outgoing for particular clients, or for hosted outbound services (EasyDNS offers this), then you would usually "include:" their SPF records rather than copy their rules and addresses.

Theoretically, hardcoding some addresses might be useful as a performance optimization or failsafe, but I'm not sure the value is that great, and it adds to the workload and disruption risk if and when you have to move networks. But maybe the value is greater than I'm aware.

Post reply on HN