FYI: see also [1] and [2] as additional upcoming measures by Google
[1]: https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2020/03/announcing-mobile-...
11–20 of 101 posts
FYI: see also [1] and [2] as additional upcoming measures by Google
[1]: https://webmasters.googleblog.com/2020/03/announcing-mobile-...
While keeping people on their platform is concerning and contrary to their prior position of getting out of the way of people’s information, I appreciate the snippets for one reason, I don’t have to worry about malware. Going to unknown sites is risky and even if not you may never the less get a clickjack telling people they are infected and need to click to clean up their system. It’s a no-win state.
You don't trust their content but you trust their content?
(And before people start pointing fingers at ad providers, reminder Google is one of the largest?)
For all the tiny violins that could be played about how life is getting harder for SEO practitioners, this marks a fundamental and very unwelcome change in the Web. Google have decided that it’s more profitable to keep people on its own site than redirecting them elsewhere, a big change in its contract. Before, it was ‘structure your site well and we’ll send you traffic’. Now it’s becoming, ‘structure your site well…
There is still hope if switching lay people over to more consumer friendly products. Just like any transition it’ll take time and effort.
Hopefully more people continue to switch.
Advertisers will go where the people go, but Google's balance sheets suggest there is enormous scope for a middleman to go and negotiate with the Apples/Mozillas/Microsofts of the world to give them a better cut of the search revenue.
I can imagine a key based system where I register a token with, say, "Hoogle" and then also register it with the browser doing the searching. Then get paid a tiny amount if enough searches get made with it.
If it works at all that'd be a brutal model for Google to compete with. Suddenly all the casual IT types would be directing all their friends and family to Hoogle because they make money off it. Corporations would ban Google en-mass. It'd squeeze all the revenue out of the search middleman and back to whoever controlled the computers.
For all the tiny violins that could be played about how life is getting harder for SEO practitioners, this marks a fundamental and very unwelcome change in the Web. Google have decided that it’s more profitable to keep people on its own site than redirecting them elsewhere, a big change in its contract. Before, it was ‘structure your site well and we’ll send you traffic’. Now it’s becoming, ‘structure your site well…
I like that I can google for the weather or Dr. Fauci's age and get an answer directly. The results page always has links if I care to dig deeper but 99% of the time I'd rather get the answer and move on.
I would pay money for an ad-free version of Google with the quality of results from a few years ago. I use DuckDuckGo and I find myself typing !g enough that I might change back completely.
Ad blockers work fine with Google, seem to be one of the few companies that simply don't worry about the arms race and let you block ads. You use DDG for privacy, not ad free.
If your core business income depends on stuff that you have absolutely no control over then you are living based on hopes and dreams and it's entirely your fault.
Give runnaroo a try. I’ve made if the default search engine everywhere. It’s really that good and they make it possible to enjoy the web again as well as reach relevant content instantly.
While keeping people on their platform is concerning and contrary to their prior position of getting out of the way of people’s information, I appreciate the snippets for one reason, I don’t have to worry about malware. Going to unknown sites is risky and even if not you may never the less get a clickjack telling people they are infected and need to click to clean up their system. It’s a no-win state.
If you don't trust them to not infect your system why do you trust their content? You don't trust their content but you trust their content? (And before people start pointing fingers at ad providers, reminder Google is one of the largest?)