Why write the executable with an upper-first letter? Looks quite silly and not professional imo.
Trex: A package manager for Deno
11–20 of 25 posts
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#12Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#13I don't know how trademarking naming works, or if they would even care, but Trex is already a big Composite Decking manufacturer. They have trex.com.
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#14Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#15I don't know how trademarking naming works, or if they would even care, but Trex is already a big Composite Decking manufacturer. They have trex.com.
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#16So, to me, this just looks to wrap the import map functionality with a nicer cli. For the same number of times as in days I'm torn on wether this is good. On one hand, it's a bridge for node people and adds some nice comfort tooling. On the other, it means you don't get to really understand how packages and bundling are supposed to work. I may just end up writing a post on this tonight.
It also reintroduces one of the main problems of node back into deno. https://youtu.be/M3BM9TB-8yA?t=581
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#17Why write the executable with an upper-first letter? Looks quite silly and not professional imo.
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#18Was not one of the main motivations for deno to not use a package manager?
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
It also reintroduces one of the main problems of node back into deno. https://youtu.be/M3BM9TB-8yA?t=581
not really since it is around imports map something native to deno, the purpose is to make it something familiar like npm
Re: Trex: A package manager for Deno
#20Earlier quoted context omitted.
not really since it is around imports map something native to deno, the purpose is to make it something familiar like npm
npm should not be a model to be imitated. npm modules make security audits impossible.