Live data from Hacker News

If you want fair libel law for the Internet age, get involved

eu.techcrunch.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: If you want fair libel law for the Internet age, get involved

#11

Whew! I thought this was for the US for a second. These really outta have country codes in the titles like [EU] [UK] [US]. I'm sure the rest of the world feels like everythings all fucked up when they see US headlines too... :D

Whoops, sorry. The US has already made leaps and bounds in attempting to sort this out!

Re: If you want fair libel law for the Internet age, get involved

#12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is anonymity really the solution? That basically says it's OK to say anything about anyone because there will never be any redress. I'd suggest that there should be some protection against defamation, the issue is that the laws that exist in the UK at the moment do a poor job of differentiating between defending against genuine defamation and what is frankly an abuse of process (using the process and it's associated…

1. UK != England and Wales. (Scottish law is radically different -- based on defamation rather than libel/slander -- and oddly enough, Scotland isn't a libel shopping destination.) 2. The English libel law (which is what's up for reform this year) was pushed through in the 18th century as an alternative to the dueling field for blue-bloods with swords to defend their honour. It succeeded admirably in reducing the dea…

> I'd really like to see, as a principle of law, the axiom that corporations do not have a personal reputation that can be impugned-- that reputation only applies to living human beings.

So when someone goes to forums and posts outright lies about a company (e.g., claiming that the company's software surreptitiously loads child pornography on to your computer so they can blackmail you), what recourse (if any) do you think the company should have?

Re: If you want fair libel law for the Internet age, get involved

#13
post #12
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

1. UK != England and Wales. (Scottish law is radically different -- based on defamation rather than libel/slander -- and oddly enough, Scotland isn't a libel shopping destination.) 2. The English libel law (which is what's up for reform this year) was pushed through in the 18th century as an alternative to the dueling field for blue-bloods with swords to defend their honour. It succeeded admirably in reducing the dea…

> I'd really like to see, as a principle of law, the axiom that corporations do not have a personal reputation that can be impugned-- that reputation only applies to living human beings. So when someone goes to forums and posts outright lies about a company (e.g., claiming that the company's software surreptitiously loads child pornography on to your computer so they can blackmail you), what recourse (if any) do you…

Two words: public relations.

The corporation speaks with a much louder voice than the individual.

(Moreover, web fora are the internet equivalent of a crowded bar: the law is a very blunt instrument indeed when it comes to dealing with words uttered in the heat of the moment during an ongoing conversation.)

Post reply on HN