Does this mean that robots like this will be cheaper to produce than CGI?
Finally, I can imagine the freedom of movement is a lot less in these compared to CGI models.
11–20 of 26 posts
Does this mean that robots like this will be cheaper to produce than CGI?
Finally, I can imagine the freedom of movement is a lot less in these compared to CGI models.
Funny, was recently at Disneyworld and impressed by the live-action Cinderella during the nightly fireworks/lights show. Was she a robot?
Sumulating systems similar to the acrobat robot are homeworks. I think all tbe tools are available open source.
I think this is going to end up being one of the coolest additions to the parks in recent years. If you haven't seen, they're applying this at Disneyland in the Avengers Campus area to have a "live action" Spiderman flying overhead: https://www.disneytouristblog.com/stuntronics-spider-man-ave...
Does this mean that robots like this will be cheaper to produce than CGI?
Does this mean that robots like this will be cheaper to produce than CGI?
OTOH it’s the only way to do headset-free AR which is impossible with cgi!
I think this is going to end up being one of the coolest additions to the parks in recent years. If you haven't seen, they're applying this at Disneyland in the Avengers Campus area to have a "live action" Spiderman flying overhead: https://www.disneytouristblog.com/stuntronics-spider-man-ave...
Same videos as the original post
Did you even click the link?
Funny, was recently at Disneyworld and impressed by the live-action Cinderella during the nightly fireworks/lights show. Was she a robot?
If it's a show, it's likely a real person; if it's a ride, more likely to be an animatronic.
If you want to try this at home, check out MIT 6.832 Underactuated Robotics, taught by Russ Tedrake. Lectures available on Youtube. Sumulating systems similar to the acrobat robot are homeworks. I think all tbe tools are available open source.