Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
TLDR, because they aren't set up for success like private organizations.
11–20 of 39 posts
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
TLDR, because they aren't set up for success like private organizations.
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
If I had to guess, it is because the working culture of public organizations (often a lack of motivation/incentive due to lack of competition), combined with tenure-based job security, and artificial constraints (pay structures/levels that don't align with the competitive market) mean that someone like the DoD can't really get something like this done. They wouldn't be able to hire the right talent. If they did hire…
These rules often exist as a means of ensuring fairness, as an anti-corruption measure, or to provide enough business to maintain a robust network of private contractors.
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
This was surprising to me, but in retrospect not that surprising - AMZN 2019: 280.5B - GOOG 2019: 160.7B - MSFT 2019: 125.8B total: 567.0B - DoD 2019: 686.1B
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
The point is taking advantage of cloud-native technology to gain an edge. You can throw all the servers in the universe together, and it won't give you out-of-the-box AI or ML toolkits, or hosted Kubernetes solutions.
The point is leveraging the expertise that GCP/AWS/Azure have already poured into the cloud. There are a lot of people who reasonably complain about the cost of AWS, but there are no (reasonable) people that argue that that cost (of one of the big 3 cloud providers, whichever) doesn't equate to the highest-leverage solution on the market. And if the DoD is anything... it is not price-sensitive.
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Chomsky/PentagonSystem_Chom.ht...
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
Given the dod budget is bigger than the revenue of google, amzn, and msft combined and with a million employees why can't they just build their own data centers?
I don’t mean that to be flippant. I’m under the impression that these orgs hire to some extent with the intention to make a scarce resource less available to others. Seems like a tough bidding war for the DOD to enter.