What's the issue with picking names that do not exist already? It has got the upside that millions of webpages will not appear in the results when people are searching for your project's name.
Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
11–20 of 51 posts
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#12> The default S-box > This was obtained from random.org by requesting 8,192 random bytes, as were all S-boxes tested so far. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing-up-my-sleeve_number
I would imagine anyone interested in using this for serious business™ would start with a new s-box hierarchy.
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#13Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#14Is Beamsplitter supposed to be cryptography grade or not?
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#15Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#16Granted, most people don't have this problem, but it's not nobody.
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
It would have been far better to select numbers generated by the NIST Randomness Beacon https://beacon.nist.gov/home And whilst you can sort of selectively choose which values to take from the beacon, it should reduce the ability to add a backdoor.
There are plenty of digits in pi. If the hash is secure independent of s-box selection, I'd much rather bet on pi being normal than "the NIST beacon values aren't generated by AES in CTR mode" ;-)
Yes, but
"These fears can be allayed by using numbers created in a way that leaves little room for adjustment. An example would be the use of initial digits from the number π as the constants. Using digits of π millions of places after the decimal point would not be considered trustworthy because the algorithm designer might have selected that starting point because it created a secret weakness the designer could later exploit."
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#18What's an S-box (substitution-box)?
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#19I should warn any reader not to use this or any other novel cryptographic algorithm in production. Don't use anything crypto in production until it has been very heavily analyzed for years by professional cryptographers.
If you want me to use your hash function, show me 2-3 independent analyses from independent researchers.
Re: Show HN: Beamsplitter – a new possibly universal hash
#20Would it be reasonable to move to `.c` so that it can be integrated in all sorts of things?
Aside, when something is Apache licensed, and someone wants to make, say an Erlang NIF with something, what effects does that embedding have on the NIF library and users of the NIF library?