Or you can do this: https://www.google.com/search?q=shirt+-stripes
You can also do "plain shirt", but the repo is making a message about the smartness of our search engines.
Shirt Without Stripes
11–20 of 639 posts
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#12Learn you some Google-foo.
Don't say what it isn't. Say what it is.
"shirt solid color"
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#13The point of this isn't asking how to apply boolean search operators, it's showing that the largest AI-focused companies in the world absolutely suck at NLP.
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#14Probably not surprising that most people don’t know, but negative keyword search works on all these platforms:
shirt -stripes
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#15Or you can do this: https://www.google.com/search?q=shirt+-stripes
The '-' operator stopped working for me with Google a while back. Not sure why, it's fairly frustrating.
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#16Learn you some Google-foo. Don't say what it isn't. Say what it is. "shirt solid color"
That’s obviously not the point here.
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#17Learn you some Google-foo. Don't say what it isn't. Say what it is. "shirt solid color"
Google-Fu == working around machine learning limitations which is the point of this post.
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#18This is expected, not wanted though, I would expect some semantic analysis translated into "shirt -stripes", but what you really mean is "solid color shirt". This is a tough one but surely something that can be tackled with research
Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#19Re: Shirt Without Stripes
#20The point of this isn't asking how to apply boolean search operators, it's showing that the largest AI-focused companies in the world absolutely suck at NLP.
I'd go as far as saying "AI" is only as good as someone has taken the time to program the use case.