Live data from Hacker News

Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

stratechery.com

11–20 of 47 posts

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#11
"Apple’s dominant position in portable devices, particularly the high end."

Is this person unfamiliar with technology specs because their products are average devices but cost excessive for what you get?

It seriously sounds like they fell for the marketing.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#12

"Apple’s dominant position in portable devices, particularly the high end." Is this person unfamiliar with technology specs because their products are average devices but cost excessive for what you get? It seriously sounds like they fell for the marketing.

Not sure what you mean, but iPads and iPhones are high end portable devices in a market in which Apple holds a dominant position.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#13

"Apple’s dominant position in portable devices, particularly the high end." Is this person unfamiliar with technology specs because their products are average devices but cost excessive for what you get? It seriously sounds like they fell for the marketing.

Not sure what you mean, but iPads and iPhones are high end portable devices in a market in which Apple holds a dominant position.

Brand new account, named “modsRapple”, with only this comment. Safe to ignore.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#14
post #6
post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Netflix is not good at creating content. Why would you say that? These days, many of the most talked about and watched shows are Netflix content. Like for instance, Tiger King is the most talked about show in America right now, Netflix owned and produced. > Netflix is not a business entity I would long. It is absolutely a fad, and will lose negotiating power to distributors and content creators. This seems to be a…

I think a perhaps more accurate way of stating the position is that "Netflix is not good enough at creating enough good content [to make up for 1) existing back catalogs and 2) parallel activity from strong competition]. I don't think anyone could definitively state that Netflix content is subpar when it's at its best, but I also don't think anyone would suggest they'd be willing to give up the big studios and rely e…

Content ages. People want new topical content. Even someone who owned the entire criterion collection would still have problems.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#15
post #9
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think a perhaps more accurate way of stating the position is that "Netflix is not good enough at creating enough good content [to make up for 1) existing back catalogs and 2) parallel activity from strong competition]. I don't think anyone could definitively state that Netflix content is subpar when it's at its best, but I also don't think anyone would suggest they'd be willing to give up the big studios and rely e…

As things start to fracture more and more, the big studios kind of find themselves in the same position. Disney+ probably has one of the strongest single-publisher back catalogs, and there's still a lot of talk about there being nothing to watch after you finish the few originals and whatever old thing you were interested in.

Yeah, Netflix has far more new exclusive content. And by that, I'm counting out all of the currently released movies Disney has also on Disney+, since many saw those in theaters.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#16

"Apple’s dominant position in portable devices, particularly the high end." Is this person unfamiliar with technology specs because their products are average devices but cost excessive for what you get? It seriously sounds like they fell for the marketing.

They own basically all consumers making six figure salaries. That is the high end customer base Ben is talking about.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#17
It's still baffling that Apple is allowed to have such strict controls over their platform while still competing with the products they're charging rent to to be on it (i.e. iTunes & Spotify).

I get why some make the analogy with Grocery Stores and stocking their in-house brands (e.g. Safeway with Signature, Apple with iTunes), but with Apple, it's like the customer has already bought the grocery store and Apple is still charging rent on their shelves.

At least it looks like they're loosening the controls a bit with deals, but that's only for big overlapping partners like Amazon.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#18

TLDR: Both are afraid of Netflix making channel subscriptions superfluous. It's an interesting read with lots of explanations.

Yeah, I don't agree with their analysis of Disney+ either. It's as you say, these big corps are trying to claw back revenue that Netflix has been enjoying.

I doubt the reason Disney really went into Disney+ was to enhance the Disney magic experience or whatever. Maybe if Walt were still alive. It seems more likely that Disney did the cost/benefit analysis and decided that Netflix subscriptions were not zero sum and that parents would definitely pay for another subscription for Frozen and other shows.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#19

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Not sure what you mean, but iPads and iPhones are high end portable devices in a market in which Apple holds a dominant position.

Brand new account, named “modsRapple”, with only this comment. Safe to ignore.

Ahh because rational argument doesn't count because of a name?

Be careful Thanatos, don't rely on tradition and authority figures. That's pre scientific method ways of thinking.

Re: Apple, Amazon, and Common Enemies

#20
post #16

"Apple’s dominant position in portable devices, particularly the high end." Is this person unfamiliar with technology specs because their products are average devices but cost excessive for what you get? It seriously sounds like they fell for the marketing.

They own basically all consumers making six figure salaries. That is the high end customer base Ben is talking about.

I've seen the opposite, but I'm in embedded engineering. I imagine lawyers and physicians are less tech savvy and more susceptible to Marketing.
Post reply on HN