11–16 of 16 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not clear to me what you're trying to show? Are you saying the later examples look more complex?
Of course they do. Of course they are. The simplest code change turns the code in to a monadic/functor soup.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
It's not clear to me what you're trying to show? Are you saying the later examples look more complex?
Of course they do. Of course they are. The simplest code change turns the code in to a monadic/functor soup.
I simply love it how every single Haskell framework I've seen that has "ease of development" and "it's easy" and similar immediately devolves from this (from Concur's docs [1]): hello = do button [onClick] [text "Say Hello"] text "Hello Sailor!" into this: inputWidget = input [(Changed onChange, Focused or this: inputWidget st = input [st {focusCount = st.focusCount+1} st {currentText = s}) onChange] for even the sli…
inputWidget = let
changeAction = do
v inputWidget st = let
focusAction = do
_ Believe it or not, many Haskell programmers prefer brevity when it comes to programs like this. They're honestly not that unreadable once you learn the meaning of a few infix operators.
I simply love it how every single Haskell framework I've seen that has "ease of development" and "it's easy" and similar immediately devolves from this (from Concur's docs [1]): hello = do button [onClick] [text "Say Hello"] text "Hello Sailor!" into this: inputWidget = input [(Changed onChange, Focused or this: inputWidget st = input [st {focusCount = st.focusCount+1} st {currentText = s}) onChange] for even the sli…
I simply love it how every single Haskell framework I've seen that has "ease of development" and "it's easy" and similar immediately devolves from this (from Concur's docs [1]): hello = do button [onClick] [text "Say Hello"] text "Hello Sailor!" into this: inputWidget = input [(Changed onChange, Focused or this: inputWidget st = input [st {focusCount = st.focusCount+1} st {currentText = s}) onChange] for even the sli…
The second example can be rewritten as such: inputWidget = let changeAction = do v and likewise for the third: inputWidget st = let focusAction = do _ (I didn't compile this, so hopefully there's no major mistakes here) Believe it or not, many Haskell programmers prefer brevity when it comes to programs like this. They're honestly not that unreadable once you learn the meaning of a few infix operators.
I simply love it how every single Haskell framework I've seen that has "ease of development" and "it's easy" and similar immediately devolves from this (from Concur's docs [1]): hello = do button [onClick] [text "Say Hello"] text "Hello Sailor!" into this: inputWidget = input [(Changed onChange, Focused or this: inputWidget st = input [st {focusCount = st.focusCount+1} st {currentText = s}) onChange] for even the sli…
The second example can be rewritten as such: inputWidget = let changeAction = do v and likewise for the third: inputWidget st = let focusAction = do _ (I didn't compile this, so hopefully there's no major mistakes here) Believe it or not, many Haskell programmers prefer brevity when it comes to programs like this. They're honestly not that unreadable once you learn the meaning of a few infix operators.