(honestly, once the US empire is gone for good, historians will have a good laugh about their stubborn refusal to adopt the metric system. Must be the worst case of NIH in history)
The density needs to exceed 223,563/sq. mile (says the essay). Singapore's density at 20,445/sq. mile is less than 1/2 that of Monaco, says its reference 5, which is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_and_dependen... . Thus, only 10% of the land is needed, giving plenty of space for roads, etc. Of course, if you include walls then you can place people on either side of the wall without an infection probl…
I stand corrected, also the model does not take into account the Z axis, magnitudes of area added by highrises.
Yes - it really should be spheres, but ones that cannot use other spheres for support :-)
I find impossible to read those kind of things when you use the United States customary units
I don't know it is easy to translate feet from US to German. I just need to know which city the unit refers to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsolete_German_units_of_mea... /S (honestly, once the US empire is gone for good, historians will have a good laugh about their stubborn refusal to adopt the metric system. Must be the worst case of NIH in history)
To be fair, over here in the UK, we have MPH for roads, stones and pounds for peoples weight (kilograms are becoming more popular, in particular for the under 25s), feet and inches for peoples height (meters becoming more popular for under 25s). So we have a bit of a hybrid really, I am 36 so get a bit of both, but my parents need everything converted to "old money" as they call it, they can't imagine what 25cm length is, they would need it in feet and inches. It is less stubborn for them, more, "why bother"? They can get by as is and have other things to occupy their time than trying to work out what familiar distances and weights are using a different scaler. Given that roads are still imperial as are lots of other things (mattress sizes, timber sizes, etc) it isn't like if they switched to metric it would even fix anything useful.
I don't know it is easy to translate feet from US to German. I just need to know which city the unit refers to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsolete_German_units_of_mea... /S (honestly, once the US empire is gone for good, historians will have a good laugh about their stubborn refusal to adopt the metric system. Must be the worst case of NIH in history)
To be fair, over here in the UK, we have MPH for roads, stones and pounds for peoples weight (kilograms are becoming more popular, in particular for the under 25s), feet and inches for peoples height (meters becoming more popular for under 25s). So we have a bit of a hybrid really, I am 36 so get a bit of both, but my parents need everything converted to "old money" as they call it, they can't imagine what 25cm lengt…
I think the important distinction here is that the UK is definately on the path to transitioning away sensibly in that imperial units haven't been taught at any school at any level for many years. All product units (litres, kgs etc) in shops are given in both metric and imperial, with the metric part required by law and the imperial part there for old people's convenience.
I don't know it is easy to translate feet from US to German. I just need to know which city the unit refers to: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Obsolete_German_units_of_mea... /S (honestly, once the US empire is gone for good, historians will have a good laugh about their stubborn refusal to adopt the metric system. Must be the worst case of NIH in history)
To be fair, over here in the UK, we have MPH for roads, stones and pounds for peoples weight (kilograms are becoming more popular, in particular for the under 25s), feet and inches for peoples height (meters becoming more popular for under 25s). So we have a bit of a hybrid really, I am 36 so get a bit of both, but my parents need everything converted to "old money" as they call it, they can't imagine what 25cm lengt…
Indeed, they would, with 6 feet to the edge of their circle, and another 6 feet from that edge to the next person.
You are correct. The diameter should be 6 feet and the radius 3 feet.
That means people would only be at least 3 feet away, not 6 feet. The original assumption was right.. need a 6 foot radius, 12 foot diameter to meet social distancing guidelines