Live data from Hacker News

Spatial Interfaces (2019)

darkblueheaven.com

11–18 of 18 posts

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#11
The point of video meetings and "who goes next" is valid. Have actually had the exact issue. Simple fix could be to order the faces the same way on everybody's screen.

If I'm have one-to-one meeting, I prefer to site face-to-face with other person. Of course with multiple participants this is not possible. Wouldn't it be an example of "bad skeumorphism" if the video conferencing would take these real-life limitations to software? While the grid-of-faces is not natural, it allows you to see everybody at once.

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#13

The point of video meetings and "who goes next" is valid. Have actually had the exact issue. Simple fix could be to order the faces the same way on everybody's screen. If I'm have one-to-one meeting, I prefer to site face-to-face with other person. Of course with multiple participants this is not possible. Wouldn't it be an example of "bad skeumorphism" if the video conferencing would take these real-life limitations…

Yes, you’re certainly right about that. I often find that the gallery view in Zoom is the best possible interface. And the limitations of real life might not be better on a screen. But I’m still left wondering...isn’t something more creative possible here?

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#14
post #5

Spatial Interfaces are highly underrated and misunderstood. In the field where I operate (UI/UX design) there are 2 loud camps: Pro skeuomorphism and Pro flat. IMHO, both miss the point. Spatial interfaces are under explored, even though it's how our brains operate. I'm currently studying the topic of spatial interfaces regarding how our brains work. Or at least, the little bit we know about how memories and thoughts…

I’d love to hear more about your work.

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#15

The point of video meetings and "who goes next" is valid. Have actually had the exact issue. Simple fix could be to order the faces the same way on everybody's screen. If I'm have one-to-one meeting, I prefer to site face-to-face with other person. Of course with multiple participants this is not possible. Wouldn't it be an example of "bad skeumorphism" if the video conferencing would take these real-life limitations…

Yes, you’re certainly right about that. I often find that the gallery view in Zoom is the best possible interface. And the limitations of real life might not be better on a screen. But I’m still left wondering...isn’t something more creative possible here?

specifically for standups: you can have a predefined list of people, displayed in fixed positions in the grids. guests can have another box displayed in the same order for everyone.

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#16
post #4

Very interesting research domain, on the one hand computers are so powerful because they can decouple us from our spatial reality, on the other hand we need the spatiality to be able to navigate the computational structures. If you are interested in this kind of stuff definitely also research Embodied Cognition theory.

Very interested. Can you recommend any seminal works?

Re: Spatial Interfaces (2019)

#17
post #4

Very interesting research domain, on the one hand computers are so powerful because they can decouple us from our spatial reality, on the other hand we need the spatiality to be able to navigate the computational structures. If you are interested in this kind of stuff definitely also research Embodied Cognition theory.

Very interested. Can you recommend any seminal works?

This online entry is a pretty good starting point https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/embodied-cognition/
Post reply on HN