Live data from Hacker News

Little Ideas

collaborativefund.com

11–13 of 13 posts

Re: Little Ideas

#11

"The 90-9-1 Rule: In social media networks, 90% of users just read content, 9% of users contribute a little content, and 1% of users contribute almost all the content." What percentage of people started typing something, deleted it, started typing something else, then gave up when they realized they had nothing of value to contribute or out of fear of rejection?

This reddit post, invocatively titled Most of What You Read on the Internet is Written by Insane People, builds up on that rule.

https://old.reddit.com/r/slatestarcodex/comments/9rvroo/most...

Re: Little Ideas

#12
> Google Scholar Effect: Scientific research depends on citing other research, and the research that gets cited the most is whatever shows up in the top results of Google Scholar searches, regardless of its contribution to the field.

As a scientist, to me, this is extremely dangerous. We don't know what the Google Scholar search algorithm exactly is. But it does put highly cited papers on top, meaning those papers get cited more in the future. I see this as preventing alternate lines of investigation in a subfield not being successful as much.

Post reply on HN