What's SAP?
11–20 of 622 posts
Re: What's SAP?
#12Nicely written article, but I don’t see what the use of an ERP is? Can’t it just be replicated with some excel spreadsheets?
I mean, that's literally how you price enterprise software.
Re: What's SAP?
#13SAP is the worst software I've ever used in my entire life; they literally have to publish paid books on how to use it, that's how bad it is.
Re: What's SAP?
#14SAP wouldn't be that disheartening to use if it weren't so damn slow and if UI/UX wasn't from the 90s.
I love the SAP UI - yea, its the 90's when UI was far superior than today's whitespace filled, shadow-less buttons, complete lack of skeumorphic elements, magenta gradients and huge typography - See Windows 95 UI: https://twitter.com/tuomassalo/status/978717292023500805 It is dense, extremely clear and consice. I agree with the slowness though.
I'm a power user so I am not the best person to ask for UX advice, but I talk to people all the time that just wish they still had the classic Windows 9x UI's and things more or less were "boring".
Reminds me a little bit of a statement about how Taxi drivers can tell you what works architecturally better than an actual architect when it comes to ground floor interaction.
Re: What's SAP?
#15SAP is the worst software I've ever used in my entire life; they literally have to publish paid books on how to use it, that's how bad it is.
Re: What's SAP?
#16Some consultant had told "Adopting an ERP (SAP, Oracle or other) is a stronger bond than marriage". So those valuations could be strong and long term.
Re: What's SAP?
#17Nicely written article, but I don’t see what the use of an ERP is? Can’t it just be replicated with some excel spreadsheets?
Re: What's SAP?
#18That's actually a very well written article. I never imagined an article about SAP or ERP would be interesting to read.
Re: What's SAP?
#19Wow, really?
Re: What's SAP?
#20SAP wouldn't be that disheartening to use if it weren't so damn slow and if UI/UX wasn't from the 90s.
I love the SAP UI - yea, its the 90's when UI was far superior than today's whitespace filled, shadow-less buttons, complete lack of skeumorphic elements, magenta gradients and huge typography - See Windows 95 UI: https://twitter.com/tuomassalo/status/978717292023500805 It is dense, extremely clear and consice. I agree with the slowness though.
However, just because it resembles 90's UI (which I'm a massive fan of) doesn't mean it follows it philosophically. It regularly breaks its own rules and is deliberately designed to be obscure as possible.