Live data from Hacker News

New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

vice.com

11–20 of 80 posts

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#11
post #4

Generally seems like a good idea, minus the part about it being state owned and operated. If it's operated by the state, it will probably be a disaster. Many governments can barely keep their Windows machines up to date, leading to ransomware attacks. It would be a shame if people's money were held hostage for ransom.

On the contrary, payments is critical infrastructure, like roads or social security, that needs to be publicly owned and operated, immune to the rise of cancel culture, and other whims of the techno-elites. No one should be denied their right to basic economics because someone in power at a private company disagrees with their politics

> payments is critical infrastructure, like roads or social security, that needs to be publicly owned and operated

So if one day Bitcoin becomes the norm, do you believe it has be handled by the government? If you think so, how do you think the government will be able to enforce that?

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#12

The piecemeal attempts to create a rational payments system are getting to the point where the Fed just needs to acknowledge the need for a free/secure/unified infrastructure run and regulated by the government. They are starting to do this (Fed real time payment + settlement system) but not fast enough. Other countries laugh at us when we talk about the checks we have to write, the scams we endure with mistaken paym…

If you take away profits from banks for processing your transactions it is called socialism?

Half trolling.

Single Euro Payment Area wire transfers are always free, by the law.

Naturally banks need to make profit, but it is prices little bit more transparently as monthly fees.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#13
post #10
post #4

Generally seems like a good idea, minus the part about it being state owned and operated. If it's operated by the state, it will probably be a disaster. Many governments can barely keep their Windows machines up to date, leading to ransomware attacks. It would be a shame if people's money were held hostage for ransom.

The largest private companies in the world (e.g., Yahoo, Facebook, Equifax, Target) can barely keep user data private, leading to massive data breaches. It would be a shame if people's private information were to be compromised with essentially zero recourse.

Ideally there would be regulation that drastically limits the blast radius of such incidents. In a perfect world, these companies would not be allowed to hold on to private information and would simply operate as zero-knowledge networks in the same way that Internet carriers do (in theory at least).

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#14
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

On the contrary, payments is critical infrastructure, like roads or social security, that needs to be publicly owned and operated, immune to the rise of cancel culture, and other whims of the techno-elites. No one should be denied their right to basic economics because someone in power at a private company disagrees with their politics

The government should define what's okay and what's not (aka regulation), and let private entities duke it out for a reasonable share of the economic value.

Why not let consumers decide on what's better for them?

What does centralized (and politicized) regulation do better than then free market?

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#15

This is aimed at solving one of several problems people without bank accounts have. So let's just figure out why people don't have bank accounts and account for that: > People who are unbanked often cite distrust of the banking system, lack of access to government-issued ID, or inability to maintain a minimum balance as reasons they don’t have bank accounts. Seems easy enough to me. Make government-issued IDs free, m…

> if you don't trust banks, you have nobody to blame but yourself

Well, the banks made a pretty good case for why they can't be trusted in 2008.

That doesn't mean I don't use a bank. It's just not practical to go without one, and I trust the government-backed insurance of my funds for when the bank fails, but I don't trust the banks themselves one single bit.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#16
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

The government should define what's okay and what's not (aka regulation), and let private entities duke it out for a reasonable share of the economic value.

Why not let consumers decide on what's better for them? What does centralized (and politicized) regulation do better than then free market?

Having multiple private entities competing for customers allows consumers the opportunity to decide what they want.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#17

The piecemeal attempts to create a rational payments system are getting to the point where the Fed just needs to acknowledge the need for a free/secure/unified infrastructure run and regulated by the government. They are starting to do this (Fed real time payment + settlement system) but not fast enough. Other countries laugh at us when we talk about the checks we have to write, the scams we endure with mistaken paym…

It’s ok, we laughed at other countries that didn’t have robust credit systems and required people to pay for things with debit cards instead of credit cards, where they could be personally liable for any sort of fraud that takes place with their card.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#18
post #4

Generally seems like a good idea, minus the part about it being state owned and operated. If it's operated by the state, it will probably be a disaster. Many governments can barely keep their Windows machines up to date, leading to ransomware attacks. It would be a shame if people's money were held hostage for ransom.

Imagine the next government shutdown over budget.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#19

This is aimed at solving one of several problems people without bank accounts have. So let's just figure out why people don't have bank accounts and account for that: > People who are unbanked often cite distrust of the banking system, lack of access to government-issued ID, or inability to maintain a minimum balance as reasons they don’t have bank accounts. Seems easy enough to me. Make government-issued IDs free, m…

> if you don't trust banks, you have nobody to blame but yourself Well, the banks made a pretty good case for why they can't be trusted in 2008. That doesn't mean I don't use a bank. It's just not practical to go without one, and I trust the government-backed insurance of my funds for when the bank fails, but I don't trust the banks themselves one single bit.

Even with deposit insurance, if there's a run on your bank you want the money out ASAP, because the money is only useful to you if you can reasonably access it, and waiting a few days or weeks for a check in the mail can make or break people living paycheck to paycheck.

Re: New York is proposing the creation of a 'public Venmo'

#20

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> if you don't trust banks, you have nobody to blame but yourself Well, the banks made a pretty good case for why they can't be trusted in 2008. That doesn't mean I don't use a bank. It's just not practical to go without one, and I trust the government-backed insurance of my funds for when the bank fails, but I don't trust the banks themselves one single bit.

Even with deposit insurance, if there's a run on your bank you want the money out ASAP, because the money is only useful to you if you can reasonably access it, and waiting a few days or weeks for a check in the mail can make or break people living paycheck to paycheck.

Yes, you're absolutely right, that's why I have split my money over two banks. Hopefully they won't fail at the same time.
Post reply on HN