edit: grammar
Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
11–20 of 30 posts
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#12I support this, but not enough to give my name and email to Mozilla to sign a petition. Am I being paranoid?
Edit: I changed my mind. Why is this page infected with google analytics?
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#13Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#14Dear Mozilla stop including unblockable Google analytics in your browser.
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#15On the CII best practices badge site, we implement responsible links. As explained in our security assurance case, "We do have links to social media sites (e.g., from the home page), but we do this in a privacy-respecting manner. It would be easy to use techniques like embedding images from external (third party) social media sites, but we intentionally do not do that, because that would expose to an external unrelated site what our users are doing without their knowledge. We instead use the approach described in "Responsible Social Share Links" by Jonathan Suh (March 26, 2015), specifically using share URLs. In this approach, if a user does not press the link, the social media site never receives any information. Instead, a social media site only receives information when the user takes a direct action to request it (e.g., a click), and that site only receives information from the specific user who requested it."
Source: https://github.com/coreinfrastructure/best-practices-badge/b...
Suh's page: https://jonsuh.com/blog/social-share-links/#use-share-urls
I don't mind people sharing information on Facebook, as long as they choose to do so. If they chose to do it, that's fantastic. What bothers me is Facebook being able to track people without their consent.
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#16One of the most unavoidable tracking services is reCAPTCHA, and the latest version works best when it is embedded in every page of a site. reCAPTCHA v3 collects sensitive personal data, such as mouse movements (which may reveal health issues), it maps how you interact with content, and your browsing history can be reconstructed from the pages you visit. Think of it as Google Analytics, but one from which you cannot opt out, because that means you're denied service on the respective site.
Given reCAPTCHA's popularity, this is effectively an inescapable data harvesting operation, since it uses Google's company-wide privacy policy, which gives them the right to use your data for ad personalization.
The turning point for Mozilla would be to call this out, and stand up against personal data collection for which consent cannot be freely given.
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#17It is quite possible to responsibly implement Facebook "like" buttons on your own pages without violating your users' privacy. I wish more people would do it. I suspect that including Facebook like Pages the way Facebook wants you to do it could be considered a gdpr violation, if it were interpreted that way perhaps people would actually fix it. On the CII best practices badge site, we implement responsible links. As…
There's also the advertising trackers that track every aspect of your website's users. These are usually added as is and for a variety of reasons - measure conversion, tag a user as converted to not show them ads anymore, retargeting...etc. Good luck convincing your marketing team to not add any of these trackers.
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#18Really weird to see this posted on a site that uses Google Analytics. I performed a quick search and couldn't find a similar post from Mozilla complaining that people can't opt-out from Google Analytics. I guess the > $500M/year Mozilla gets from Google buys a bunch of selective outrage.
Re: Dear Facebook: Stop cross site tracking by default
#19It is quite possible to responsibly implement Facebook "like" buttons on your own pages without violating your users' privacy. I wish more people would do it. I suspect that including Facebook like Pages the way Facebook wants you to do it could be considered a gdpr violation, if it were interpreted that way perhaps people would actually fix it. On the CII best practices badge site, we implement responsible links. As…
It's been a while but I remember going out of the way to strip all the JS surrounding both Like and Share buttons for Facebook. It was trivial to implement at the time. I did it because I didn't like being tracked and didn't want to inflict that on the users either. However, I had to fight for it. PM wanted the share count & page like count to show up. That can't be done without FB JS code. There's also the advertisi…