Live data from Hacker News

Self-Hosted Dropbox Alternatives

makeuseof.com

11–16 of 16 posts

Re: Self-Hosted Dropbox Alternatives

#11
For those of us that have the same aversion to setting up an entire web server for a simple browser-based access to their files as I have, I recommend also having a look at https://filebrowser.xyz

I have an instance running at home (reachable only via VPN) that simultaneously syncs the files via Syncthing, and the combination of the two is surprisingly effective.

Re: Self-Hosted Dropbox Alternatives

#13
I have been a very happy user of Syncthing over Wireguard (connecting all my devices back home). Adding to that a VM of "OpenMediaVault" for NAS/Backup, PiHole to catch what Ublock misses, and music streaming via FunkWhale, I have managed to host a good majority of my own data.

Re: Self-Hosted Dropbox Alternatives

#14
post #8

What about not fully Dropbox alternatives, but simple solutions to have a backup of files online and sync those files with different computers?

Unison works well. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/

rsync is incredible efficient and reliable. I use Nextcloud for some things. But it is just too slow for large data (Gigabytes and tens of thousands of files). Especially it they change frequently. HTTP and webdav is slow and the clients are not reliable. Last week I tried to transfer 20000 photos (for Mapillary) from a phone using Nextcloud. It took forever and the Nextcloud app crashed after a few hundred photos. Rsync (syncopoli on the phone) worked like a charm and did the job in no time.

Plus it is just so convenient using SSH because you can easily make tunnels and still have end-to-end encryption.

Re: Self-Hosted Dropbox Alternatives

#15
post #8

What about not fully Dropbox alternatives, but simple solutions to have a backup of files online and sync those files with different computers?

Unison works well. https://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/ rsync is incredible efficient and reliable. I use Nextcloud for some things. But it is just too slow for large data (Gigabytes and tens of thousands of files). Especially it they change frequently. HTTP and webdav is slow and the clients are not reliable. Last week I tried to transfer 20000 photos (for Mapillary) from a phone using Nextcloud. It took fore…

Large sized files are not a problem with Nextcloud. Large amounts of files in a single directory are. A .git dir in nextcloud will trash performance.... but my photo library is perfectly performant :shrug:
Post reply on HN