Live data from Hacker News

Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

clearerthinking.org

11–20 of 355 posts

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#11

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

What would you recommend a person in that situation say instead?

"Knock it off"

That's what I'd rather be on the receiving end of.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#12
post #7

I learned this at a company retreat at some point. We all kind of rolled our eyes and went along with the exercise. I now use it to great effect almost daily in both personal and professional relationships. It takes a little care and thought to apply it well. I've found when done effectively, it can unlock difficult conversations and turn even the most hostile interactions into productive conversations. You are demon…

> We all kind of rolled our eyes and went along with the exercise. I now use it to great effect almost daily in both personal and professional relationships.

Reactions like that tell me once again that a lot of people really underestimate simple stuff like this. I hope that in the future simple and useful psychology topics will find their way into our schools so that the acceptance and understanding for the usefulness will increase (hopefully).

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#13

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

I wouldn't say passive aggressive because that has a specific definition which this doesn't meet but there's something about them that's off.

"Would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?” isn't really a question because "no" isn't really an acceptable answer so there's something dirty about phrasing like a question but I can't quite put my finger on what.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#14

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

These are fairly contrived examples, but in all of them the requestor is making a pretty clear statement of their feelings and what they want, even at risk of being verbose.

The characteristic of true passive-aggressive responses is to avoid direct confrontation, to mask conflict. For example, maybe by making a "joke" ("How's that food of mine that you're eating?") or by saying that somethings okay but not really meaning it ("I totally don't mind that you're eating all my food") or various other techniques.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#15

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

What would you recommend a person in that situation say instead?

Would you be willing to tell me what you recommend a person say in that situation instead?

To me it does sound more passive-aggressive to circumlocute vs just directly ask. I guess specifically because it implies a "no" would be due to simple unwillingness, which in a sense is always implicit but sort of routes around that a person may have reasons beyond simple obstinate refusal to grant the request.

FWIW, in my limited Spanish language experience, requests at least with friends are often far more direct e.g. "dame el agua" (give me the water) vs. "could you give me the water?" in English. Took me a while to get used to, but made me consider the way we phrase requests in English, and the importance how one intonates speech.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#16
I think non-violent communication is great when you actually have to ask someone to change something about the way they operate in the world.

If you want to improve your relationships though, make rule zero "minimize the extent to which you require other people in the world to change."

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#17

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

What would you recommend a person in that situation say instead?

Maybe just "would you only eat the food that you buy?”

I'm not sure I agree it sounds passive aggressive. But couching everything with "would you be willing to" sounds odd.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#19

I've read "Nonviolent Communication: A Language of Life" and found it helpful in personal & work communication. I _hate_ the name, though. I don't want to suggest to someone that they read about non-violent communication because that suggests they're being violent when they're not. I'd prefer almost any other name. Some better names: "observational communication", "non-judgmental communication", "empathetic communica…

I completely agree. For a book that stresses the importance of non-judgmental understanding, the name makes it awfully hard to recommend to someone without coming across as being quite judgmental.

Re: Interested in improving your relationships? Try Nonviolent Communication

#20

the requests all sound very passive aggressive to me. eg, “ would you be willing to only eat the food that you buy?”

That's not passive aggressive. That's a direct ask, to your face, just worded softly.

It's not a "direct ask". The "would you be willing to" hides the direct question behind weasel words and adds confusion. The additional phrase equivocates the person's initial point; now it is ambigious if the person asking about the food cares at all about the food itself, or is just curious about if the person would be willing.

The person could say "Yes" and then nothing will change, because this is not a "direct ask" to them in the first place.

Post reply on HN