What I think is the problem is the terminology. 'Verified' makes it sound like there is some identity checking going on. It is nonsense to say that because someone is posting on 2 platforms, they suddenly aren't who they say they are. If you use the term 'affiliate' or 'partner' it is a different story. If you are posting on 2 or more platforms, it is logical for all involved platforms to not feel like partners anymo…
Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
11–20 of 151 posts
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#12Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#13This “verified” nonsense is silly. Twitter knew who Assange was but refused to “verify” him. They should change what they call verified to another label like “goodie two-shoes” instead. As it is is a complete misnomer. It’s basically used to get users to behave a certain way and if they don’t conform they don’t get verified or if they are verified it gets revoked.
I think making it a brand-coloured tick conveyed too much of a positive message so people took it as an endorsement, leading to pressure to "unverify" if that person did or said something bad.
Given that action, the "verified" tick then becomes an even stronger signal of endorsement.
Perhaps it would be better to call them "Partners" like on Twitch and make it an explicit contract with revenue kickback.
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#14Not that I agree with this practice, but I've heard from people who stream on twitch that if you are streaming on their platform, you cannot stream to you-tube, d-live or other platforms and keep the affiliate/partner status which allows viewers to subscribe and donate via twitch currency to you. You may stream to multiple platforms at once, however you lose your ability to be verified on twitch by being an affiliate…
In an ideal world: Yes. In our world? Hm,... My intuition says "no".
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#15What I think is the problem is the terminology. 'Verified' makes it sound like there is some identity checking going on. It is nonsense to say that because someone is posting on 2 platforms, they suddenly aren't who they say they are. If you use the term 'affiliate' or 'partner' it is a different story. If you are posting on 2 or more platforms, it is logical for all involved platforms to not feel like partners anymo…
Maybe they'll no longer show you as verified. Maybe your posts will be demoted a bit in the feed. Maybe you now longer show up when people search for you. Maybe your sub becomes quarantined for an obviously for an obviously false reason (facts don't matter). Maybe you see more captchas. Maybe pages start loading more slowly for you. Maybe for your subscribers. Maybe you wont be able to show ads. Maybe it's the comments that get revoked. Maybe your account gets frozen and all your funds stolen.
Most (all?) of those are actual things happening right now.
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#16This “verified” nonsense is silly. Twitter knew who Assange was but refused to “verify” him. They should change what they call verified to another label like “goodie two-shoes” instead. As it is is a complete misnomer. It’s basically used to get users to behave a certain way and if they don’t conform they don’t get verified or if they are verified it gets revoked.
"Verified" ceased to be meaningful as actual verification as soon as "unverified" became a thing. I think making it a brand-coloured tick conveyed too much of a positive message so people took it as an endorsement, leading to pressure to "unverify" if that person did or said something bad. Given that action, the "verified" tick then becomes an even stronger signal of endorsement. Perhaps it would be better to call th…
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#17Not that I agree with this practice, but I've heard from people who stream on twitch that if you are streaming on their platform, you cannot stream to you-tube, d-live or other platforms and keep the affiliate/partner status which allows viewers to subscribe and donate via twitch currency to you. You may stream to multiple platforms at once, however you lose your ability to be verified on twitch by being an affiliate…
They are afraid of other platforms, because they know their business will take a serious hit if there's ever serious competition. The cut they take off of subscriptions and donations is absolutely shady and unjustifiable. Add to that the long list of twitch "anti-features" and they're on a good course to become to Quora of streaming sites. Can't wait for just lurking to become "members only". Twitch would die in a he…
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#18This “verified” nonsense is silly. Twitter knew who Assange was but refused to “verify” him. They should change what they call verified to another label like “goodie two-shoes” instead. As it is is a complete misnomer. It’s basically used to get users to behave a certain way and if they don’t conform they don’t get verified or if they are verified it gets revoked.
When will Twitter re-open verifying? It's been closed for 2 years...
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#19Earlier quoted context omitted.
"Verified" ceased to be meaningful as actual verification as soon as "unverified" became a thing. I think making it a brand-coloured tick conveyed too much of a positive message so people took it as an endorsement, leading to pressure to "unverify" if that person did or said something bad. Given that action, the "verified" tick then becomes an even stronger signal of endorsement. Perhaps it would be better to call th…
I can think of one use case for de-verifying: when someone's account seems to have been hacked.
Your case would imply there is a confirmation interval... which I don’t think is the case.
Re: Instagram Threatened Removal of Verified Status for Posting Snapchat Content
#20Not that I agree with this practice, but I've heard from people who stream on twitch that if you are streaming on their platform, you cannot stream to you-tube, d-live or other platforms and keep the affiliate/partner status which allows viewers to subscribe and donate via twitch currency to you. You may stream to multiple platforms at once, however you lose your ability to be verified on twitch by being an affiliate…
> Not that I agree with this practice, but ... http://www.beresources.co.uk/everything-before-but-is-bullsh...
The meaning of this excerpt would be exactly the same if the word "but" were used instead of "however" (which is, I suspect, why it was worded in this clumsy way - to avoid "but"). Are we to conclude that the author doesn't actually give a shit about the "graphicness" of the headline?