My understanding is that even humans don't fully know why neural nets are doing exactly what they're doing. If we were indeed able to just press a button and have an AI give us a finished track (which is not what YACHT did here), who should take credit for the track? I certainly don't think the human who trained the net deserves all the credit, right? That feels like if an artist's otherwise absent father gave them K…
Yacht fed their old music to the machine and got a killer new album
11–13 of 13 posts
Re: Yacht fed their old music to the machine and got a killer new album
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I remember thinking about such a system a long time ago. In a theoretical sense, that seems really cool, but I'm not sure if the hardware is quite there yet. From what I can recall, practical brain-computer interfaces are still in their infancy, and not reliable enough to use even for simple binary interfaces. Otherwise, that would basically make a closed circuit for the palette generation part of this -- just let th…
Also, from an artistic standpoint, initial response isn’t everything.
Re: Yacht fed their old music to the machine and got a killer new album
#13This is both very cool and goes along the lines of the way I imagined deep learning would advance the state of the art in songwriting. YACHT's got a special place in my heart for "Psychic City" which sounds like a lost child of Talking Heads, not to mention all the other great music they've made. Secondly, it's interesting how they used the tech to stretch their existing material: they basically notated their existin…
How about a system where music is generated by a computer and a person listens to it while a functional MRI scanner provides feedback to the algorithm?