Nintendo will request a takedown the second they see this, no?
What for? There's no copyrighted material in this repo.
Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
11–20 of 180 posts
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#12Like Panzer Dragoon Saga.
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#13It would be great if this could be done for games where the source code was lost. Like Panzer Dragoon Saga.
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#14I love these instructions!
Also, I'd love to see this converted to a native executable. I wish Nintendo would actually allow that, although I'm sure they wouldn't.
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#15Still amazes me that people actually spend time on such things :D. Decompiling 100 year old software whose source code most likely didn't look much different from what the decompiler spits out. What's the point?
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#16It would be great if this could be done for games where the source code was lost. Like Panzer Dragoon Saga.
This decompile was done without the original source code, just the released game, which is effectively the same as being ‘lost’.
Nintendo still has the source to SM64.
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
What for? There's no copyrighted material in this repo.
The models and sounds aren't copyrighted? Because they are totally within the GitHub, there...
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#18Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#19As an amusing side-effect, the team working on this effort also implemented IRIX userland support for QEMU since the original N64 toolchain ran on IRIX on the SGI Indy, and they need the original compilers to verify functional equivalence of their source: https://github.com/n64decomp/qemu-irix .
What does this mean?
I think of QEMU as emulating hardware... What exactly is being emulated here?
Re: Super Mario 64 has been decompiled
#20Still amazes me that people actually spend time on such things :D. Decompiling 100 year old software whose source code most likely didn't look much different from what the decompiler spits out. What's the point?