Earlier quoted context omitted.
All the investors are already counting their winnings. They've been out for months, years. Seems like they are now just burning through a billion a month in stock option compensation before it all comes crashing down. It's bizarre to see such a blatant scam being run out in the open. People used to have shame.
Maybe because it’s not a scam and just not a profitable business venture?
Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#12this seems reactionary. I mean if they didn't need to hire those engineers in the first place, why hire them?
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#13Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#14Lots of negative responses thus far. Happy to accommodate any insider views as to why this is not what it seems to be...
If that's really happening, nobody told me. I had two interviews this week and another one scheduled two weeks from now. And last I heard, my team got approval to increase headcount by 2.
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#15Earlier quoted context omitted.
Maybe because it’s not a scam and just not a profitable business venture?
Perhaps. But I think there's a genuine question about whether it was ever reasonable to believe that Uber was going to become a profitable company. Most of the claims I read/heard that there was a legitimate path to profitability amounted to "something something on a long enough timeline something something." We may well never find out if those claims are true. After Uber is dead I'm sure there will be many wishful r…
Uber faces lower costs, and they have scale which allows them to have better targeted offers, surges, and advertising.
I noticed that they spent $3B in R&D last quarter. Presumably a lot of that is going into driverless vehicles. Exclude half of that cost, and exclude their one time IPO related costs, and they're profitable.
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#16Lots of negative responses thus far. Happy to accommodate any insider views as to why this is not what it seems to be...
I work there (and conduct engineering interviews) If that's really happening, nobody told me. I had two interviews this week and another one scheduled two weeks from now. And last I heard, my team got approval to increase headcount by 2.
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#17I think they've gotten "engineering" confused with "engineer"—plenty of people are in the engineering org that aren't engineers.
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#18The clock is ticking and they seem to have no plan at all. So weird to see such a massive company go public with no ideas or serious attempts at becoming profitable, ever. Congrats to all the investors and employees who were able to cash out before whenever. Everyone else is about to get very, very angry.
As someone who was doing projects for several companies when the dot-com bubble burst, companies like Uber and Wework seem like whatever we had then but at a far bigger scale. The fundamentals do not work so how does anyone think this will end well?
Re: Uber imposes engineer hiring freeze as losses mount
#19Lots of negative responses thus far. Happy to accommodate any insider views as to why this is not what it seems to be...
I work there (and conduct engineering interviews) If that's really happening, nobody told me. I had two interviews this week and another one scheduled two weeks from now. And last I heard, my team got approval to increase headcount by 2.