Live data from Hacker News

How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

figma.com

11–20 of 38 posts

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#11
Link to the font: https://rsms.me/inter/

I am not one who gets worked up over typefaces so my short take is "yet another san-serif font" but the discussion about why he chose to do things in certain ways was useful for me in appreciating how this font differs from other, similar offerings.

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#12
post #8

Am I the only one that wishes the article about the font "made for screens" went into more detail about what makes this specific font better for screens?

Verdana is a great example of a font designed for low-resolution screens[1].

What’s interesting is that Ikea chose to use Verdana for many of their print & in-store display material[2]. To me it looks a bit blocky and unfinished, which actually is a not a bad look for Ikea.

[1] https://www.moma.org/collection/works/139312

[2] https://www.google.com/search?q=ikea+verdana&rlz=1CDGOYI_enG...:

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#13
Roboto is installed default on many systems, specially on phones. The speed factor to me is key. That's why I avoid using webfonts. I use both San Francisco for those on Mac and iOS and Roboto for the rest of the mortals, including other san-serifs.

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#14
post #3

Is it just me or does Inter look like a clone of Helvetica?

It started as a clone of Roboto, which in turn started as a clone of Helvetica (sort of), so that's not really a surprising reaction. Fonts are weird like that.

Sort of like music sampling

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#16
The most it resembles is the San Francisco font (Apple's default system font) which itself was inspired from Helvetica and DIN.

Personally I liked this font much better than the other opensource alternatives, especially with the number of weights it offered. I am glad it's gotten popular.

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#17
post #3

Is it just me or does Inter look like a clone of Helvetica?

It started as a clone of Roboto, which in turn started as a clone of Helvetica (sort of), so that's not really a surprising reaction. Fonts are weird like that.

It’s the slightly condensed Roboto look but I’d say it looks a lot more like San Francisco with fewer things parallel to the baseline (not as bad as Arial vs Helvetica, but noticeable).

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#18
post #6

> With a typeface, it's just this black box as to who is using some of the stuff, then you have no way of reaching back. You're completely reliant on whoever makes use of it tells you about it, which probably no one does, right? I've seen multiple websites (What The Font being one of them) which analyses a picture with text. They then try to guess the font being used. If you could automate this process, you might be…

What The Font does an amazing job sometimes, but it's not infallible. I'd say it misses more often than it hits.

Web crawling seems like a great idea, but probably not worth it just to get a list of customers. And it will never tell you who's using it in their app, or for signage.

Re: How the new open-source typeface used by GitHub and Mozilla came to be

#20
post #8

Am I the only one that wishes the article about the font "made for screens" went into more detail about what makes this specific font better for screens?

Verdana is a great example of a font designed for low-resolution screens[1]. What’s interesting is that Ikea chose to use Verdana for many of their print & in-store display material[2]. To me it looks a bit blocky and unfinished, which actually is a not a bad look for Ikea. [1] https://www.moma.org/collection/works/139312 [2] https://www.google.com/search?q=ikea+verdana&rlz=1CDGOYI_enG... :

According to a font designer that was commissioned to design a custom font for IKEA, they decided to go with Verdana after all due to bad webfont support at the time. (They wanted to be consistent online and in-store.)

With that said, I share your opinion on Verdana and that can definitely have played a role in their decision.

Post reply on HN