Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

medium.com

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

11–20 of 22 posts

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#11

Post by benatkin »

txcwpalpha wrote: post #9
odysseas wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is not much difference between hiring a local developer vs hiring a remote. Would you ever say: Just hired a local developer. He has been sitting on his desk playing games and reading HN? Terrible stuff? If that were to happen the problem would not be the "local" developer scene. It would have been most probably your hiring practice or your bad references. My point here is that there is no free meal when you tr…

> Would you ever say: Just hired a local developer. He has been sitting on his desk playing games and reading HN? Terrible stuff? Yes, I can definitely see that happening. And the main upside of an onsite developer in that situation is that a 'local'/onsite developer is much easier to identify when they are just sitting at their desk and much easier to encourage them to do otherwise. As much as people hate the "manag…

I'd also say if you hired a remote developer without using a marketplace, but by thoughtfully searching for a remote developer using networking/references/etc, and that still happened you would have some feedback on the broken chain in the network if this happened, and could adjust what you're doing. Hopefully you'd eventually get good at it. With UpWork you aren't meaningfully learning how to recruit and manage remote developers.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#12

Post by odysseas »

ianwalter wrote: post #10
odysseas wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

:-) I would love to be on a debate meeting-room to argue with you on this for hours :-) I was attracted to it because skilled manual labor was practically abandoned by techies. 15 years after I started oDesk there are plenty of startups that are tackling the problem of building global/remote teams around engineers. Nobody is helping the crew that comes to my home to fix my fence or driveway or floor. I saw a space th…

Please don't spend hours arguing with people that don't get it haha. Home improvement has been such a pain in the butt for me and I just can't see it not being a problem for millions of people. Best of luck!

Thank you.

But to tell you the truth when I told to the Upwork team in my farewell get together what I was intending to do (I described it "home services" then ) I saw lots of raised eyebrows.

Even more when I went back home to my family in Greece, and had to explain how "building fences" for people is my best idea for how to change the world... they just thought I was making a joke :-)

So I understand completely @treelovinhippie's reaction.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#13

Post by [deleted] »

txcwpalpha wrote: post #9
odysseas wrote: post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

There is not much difference between hiring a local developer vs hiring a remote. Would you ever say: Just hired a local developer. He has been sitting on his desk playing games and reading HN? Terrible stuff? If that were to happen the problem would not be the "local" developer scene. It would have been most probably your hiring practice or your bad references. My point here is that there is no free meal when you tr…

> Would you ever say: Just hired a local developer. He has been sitting on his desk playing games and reading HN? Terrible stuff? Yes, I can definitely see that happening. And the main upside of an onsite developer in that situation is that a 'local'/onsite developer is much easier to identify when they are just sitting at their desk and much easier to encourage them to do otherwise. As much as people hate the "manag…

[deleted]

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#14

Post by odysseas »

benatkin wrote: post #11
txcwpalpha wrote: post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> Would you ever say: Just hired a local developer. He has been sitting on his desk playing games and reading HN? Terrible stuff? Yes, I can definitely see that happening. And the main upside of an onsite developer in that situation is that a 'local'/onsite developer is much easier to identify when they are just sitting at their desk and much easier to encourage them to do otherwise. As much as people hate the "manag…

I'd also say if you hired a remote developer without using a marketplace, but by thoughtfully searching for a remote developer using networking/references/etc, and that still happened you would have some feedback on the broken chain in the network if this happened, and could adjust what you're doing. Hopefully you'd eventually get good at it. With UpWork you aren't meaningfully learning how to recruit and manage remo…

I am sorry, I must be missing something. The Upwork marketplace is no different than any other source of people that may be looking for remote jobs.

When we hire engineers, we post in Upwork and several other forums and we go through the identical process vetting candidates, via multiple interviews, screenings, reference checking etc etc.

When we post in other places we have to explain that this is for a "remote" job - and many job posting sites make this very awkward - so in that sense Upwork posting is easier - since all the candidates understand/are remote ready .

However, I don't use the Upwork reference history much (sorry Hayden :-) ) - because there are too few companies that hire their long term staff remote - but thats not an Upwork problem - its "the world is broken" problem.

So this means that reference checking is hard. Shortcuts that we use, is that we trust the hiring practices of certain global companies.

Yandex for example in Russia has very strong hiring practices - this means that an engineer from Yandex is a strong qualifier . Similarly for certain companies from other countries.

I plan to put some of these practices I have learned in a follow up post - because I see how people like you end up getting burned.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#15

Post by odysseas »

_8j50 wrote: post #5
treelovinhippie wrote: post #2

Why would a guy with enough personal funds to tackle any project decide to focus on home improvement? How boring and inconsequential to the future of humanity.

People start a business first and foremost to profit by way of ROI. People live in homes,one can argue home improvement is improvement of the quality of life for people who live in homes which is very relevant to the future of humanity.

> People start a business first and foremost to profit by way of ROI. I think that's as pessimistic as saying that people work just to make money.

This may have been the case a few decades/centuries ago depending on how lucky you are in terms of where you are born.

Today the majority of the founders I know of are not driven out of "ROI" - but instead they are driven out of some personal passion/interest to change/fix some aspect of the world. You can read the various manifesto posts from Paul Graham on the topic from "what we look in founders" http://www.paulgraham.com/founders.html to "why founders are kind" (cant find the link...)

From my side, my passion is .. I want to dismantle the local-work system that makes people's life/career being determined to a large extent from where they are born.

I hate that.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#16

Post by treelovinhippie »

odysseas wrote: post #6
treelovinhippie wrote: post #2

Why would a guy with enough personal funds to tackle any project decide to focus on home improvement? How boring and inconsequential to the future of humanity.

:-) I would love to be on a debate meeting-room to argue with you on this for hours :-) I was attracted to it because skilled manual labor was practically abandoned by techies. 15 years after I started oDesk there are plenty of startups that are tackling the problem of building global/remote teams around engineers. Nobody is helping the crew that comes to my home to fix my fence or driveway or floor. I saw a space th…

I understand broke founders who go after the boring startup projects with the goal to just make money. But once you have money behind you that's your rare opportunity to tackle the profound projects that capitalism doesn't really give a shit about.

eg tackle poverty, hunger, homelessness, climate change, freeing everyone from 9-5 jobs to pursue their own passions, reducing living costs to give everyone more free time to pursue their passions, creating new models for collective governance, helping communities to bootstrap collective intelligence, distributing the web and institutions, building models for open P2P accounting and supply chains, brain computer interfaces etc etc etc etc etc.

Attempting to monopolize the home improvement industry by becoming a middleman that routes tasks and takes a cut, with the goal of selling the company off is truly lacking imagination.

At the very least you could build Ergeon as a distributed and open network co-operative. Cap your team to a max of 20 people, pay everyone including yourself the same salary, either distribute zero shares to anyone (inc founders or investors) or equal non-transferable shares to all contractors + team (with dividend payouts), setup the company such that it can never be sold (whatever legal setup makes sense), have public transparent financials, charge a 1% transaction fee but cap your annual budget and pay back any excess to the network of contractors. That would be profound.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#17

Post by odysseas »

treelovinhippie wrote: post #16
odysseas wrote: post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

:-) I would love to be on a debate meeting-room to argue with you on this for hours :-) I was attracted to it because skilled manual labor was practically abandoned by techies. 15 years after I started oDesk there are plenty of startups that are tackling the problem of building global/remote teams around engineers. Nobody is helping the crew that comes to my home to fix my fence or driveway or floor. I saw a space th…

I understand broke founders who go after the boring startup projects with the goal to just make money. But once you have money behind you that's your rare opportunity to tackle the profound projects that capitalism doesn't really give a shit about. eg tackle poverty, hunger, homelessness, climate change, freeing everyone from 9-5 jobs to pursue their own passions, reducing living costs to give everyone more free time…

> At the very least you could build Ergeon as a distributed and open network co-operative.

:-) I now get the hippie substring of your username .

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#18

Post by benatkin »

odysseas wrote: post #14
benatkin wrote: post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I'd also say if you hired a remote developer without using a marketplace, but by thoughtfully searching for a remote developer using networking/references/etc, and that still happened you would have some feedback on the broken chain in the network if this happened, and could adjust what you're doing. Hopefully you'd eventually get good at it. With UpWork you aren't meaningfully learning how to recruit and manage remo…

I am sorry, I must be missing something. The Upwork marketplace is no different than any other source of people that may be looking for remote jobs. When we hire engineers, we post in Upwork and several other forums and we go through the identical process vetting candidates, via multiple interviews, screenings, reference checking etc etc. When we post in other places we have to explain that this is for a "remote" job…

> The Upwork marketplace is no different than any other source of people that may be looking for remote jobs.

The trouble is that people will typically do their reference checking on UpWork, which incentivizes people to leave positive reviews on it, just like Uber and AirBnb do. It does tend to require real names and you can often find information about people elsewhere, but a lot of people don't. So if you try to do a more thorough check, the candidate may not be expecting it.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#19

Post by treelovinhippie »

odysseas wrote: post #17
treelovinhippie wrote: post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I understand broke founders who go after the boring startup projects with the goal to just make money. But once you have money behind you that's your rare opportunity to tackle the profound projects that capitalism doesn't really give a shit about. eg tackle poverty, hunger, homelessness, climate change, freeing everyone from 9-5 jobs to pursue their own passions, reducing living costs to give everyone more free time…

> At the very least you could build Ergeon as a distributed and open network co-operative. :-) I now get the hippie substring of your username .

Well it's either that or build middleman platforms like Upwork that force workers into bidding wars and fight over scraps to survive. You can either make the world a better place for many, or just enrich yourself.

Re: Upwork founder goes all-remote in next startup

#20

Post by cambalache »

odysseas wrote: post #15
_8j50 wrote: post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

People start a business first and foremost to profit by way of ROI. People live in homes,one can argue home improvement is improvement of the quality of life for people who live in homes which is very relevant to the future of humanity.

> People start a business first and foremost to profit by way of ROI. I think that's as pessimistic as saying that people work just to make money. This may have been the case a few decades/centuries ago depending on how lucky you are in terms of where you are born. Today the majority of the founders I know of are not driven out of "ROI" - but instead they are driven out of some personal passion/interest to change/fix…

Come on.
Post reply on HN