Earlier quoted context omitted.
If 20% of your network goes down and you can still serve clients normally, it means that you have a big reserve of machines useful only in case in big outages. I don't know if you can justify it economically. Just spin more EC2 instances ?
Yes, if you use an elastic cloud, by all means, spin more instances :-) Most existing companies still have real servers however.
CIO update: Post-mortem on the Skype outage
11–14 of 14 posts
Re: CIO update: Post-mortem on the Skype outage
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
If 20% of your network goes down and you can still serve clients normally, it means that you have a big reserve of machines useful only in case in big outages. I don't know if you can justify it economically. Just spin more EC2 instances ?
Yes, if you use an elastic cloud, by all means, spin more instances :-) Most existing companies still have real servers however.
Re: CIO update: Post-mortem on the Skype outage
#13I guess companies can have several faces, but it still strikes me as bizarre.
Re: CIO update: Post-mortem on the Skype outage
#14I wonder how they managed to launch "several thousand more mega-supernodes through the night". I assume they can't turn regular Skype nodes into supernodes because they must be reachable from a public IP address. Where they using a cloud computer provider such as EC2?